David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Logica Universalis 4 (2):163-205 (2010)
Tarski’s conceptual analysis of the notion of logical consequence is one of the pinnacles of the process of defining the metamathematical foundations of mathematics in the tradition of his predecessors Euclid, Frege, Russell and Hilbert, and his contemporaries Carnap, Gödel, Gentzen and Turing. However, he also notes that in defining the concept of consequence “efforts were made to adhere to the common usage of the language of every day life.” This paper addresses the issue of what relationship Tarski’s analysis, and Béziau’s further generalization of it in universal logic, have to reasoning in the everyday lives of ordinary people from the cognitive processes of children through to those of specialists in the empirical and deductive sciences. It surveys a selection of relevant research in a range of disciplines providing theoretical and empirical studies of human reasoning, discusses the value of adopting a universal logic perspective, answers the questions posed in the call for this special issue, and suggests some specific research challenges
|Keywords||Rationality human sciences logical consequence universal logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
G. Aldo Antonelli (2005). Grounded Consequence for Defeasible Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Aristotle (1994). Posterior Analytics. Clarendon Press.
T. Au (1984). Counterfactuals: In Reply to Alfred Bloom. Cognition 17 (3):289-302.
Lawrence Barsalou (1992). Frames, Concepts, and Conceptual Fields. In E. Kittay & A. Lehrer (eds.), Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Erlbaum. 21-74.
Jon Barwise & John Perry (1981). Situations and Attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):668-691.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ignacio Jané (2006). What is Tarski's Common Concept of Consequence? Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):1-42.
Tobias Starzak (2012). Papineau's Theoretical Rationality and the Anthropological Difference. Philosophia 40 (3):473-482.
Gabriel Sandu (2009). Logic and Semantics in the Twentieth Century. In Leila Haaparanta (ed.), The Development of Modern Logic. Oxford University Press. 562.
Leonard Angel (2006). An Interview with LA Universal Self. Sophia 45 (1):79-93.
Mark McLeod-Harrison (2009). God and (Nearly) Universal Pluralistic Antirealism. Polish Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):33-50.
Vladimir L. Vasyukov (2007). Structuring the Universe of Universal Logic. Logica Universalis 1 (2):277-294.
Matthew W. McKeon (2010). The Concept of Logical Consequence: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic. Peter Lang Pub..
William Sweet (1998). Human Rights and Cultural Diversity. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):117-132.
Added to index2010-07-26
Total downloads18 ( #130,687 of 1,696,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #111,244 of 1,696,296 )
How can I increase my downloads?