David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Natural Language Semantics 20 (1):31-57 (2012)
The existence of “local implicatures” has been the topic of much recent debate. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to this debate by asking what we can learn from three puzzles, namely, the cancellation of such implicatures by or both, their behavior in the complement clauses of negative factive verbs such as sorry, and their behavior in root and embedded questions. Two basic approaches to local implicatures have been advanced: a fully pragmatic account in which local implicatures result from conventional Gricean principles and a semantic account according to which the generation of implicatures is interwoven with compositional, grammatical mechanisms. We argue that the lesson to be learned from our three case studies is that some kind of approach along the latter, grammatical line is necessary to account for the data
|Keywords||Pragmatics Scalar implicatures Local implicatures Strawson entailment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Laurence Horn (1989). A Natural History of Negation. University of Chicago Press.
Uli Sauerland (2004). Scalar Implicatures in Complex Sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (3):367-391.
Gennaro Chierchia & Danny Fox, The Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures and the Relationship Between Semantics and Pragmatics.
E. Chemla & B. Spector (2011). Experimental Evidence for Embedded Scalar Implicatures. Journal of Semantics 28 (3):359-400.
B. Russell (2006). Against Grammatical Computation of Scalar Implicatures. Journal of Semantics 23 (4):361-382.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bart Geurts (2010). Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge University Press.
Jacques Wainer (2007). Modeling Generalized Implicatures Using Non-Monotonic Logics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (2):195-216.
Raj Singh (2008). On the Interpretation of Disjunction: Asymmetric, Incremental, and Eager for Inconsistency. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (2):245-260.
Leon Horsten (2005). On the Quantitative Scalar or-Implicature. Synthese 146 (1-2):111 - 127.
Owen Greenhall (2008). Against Chierchia's Computational Account of Scalar Implicatures. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):373-384.
Bart Geurts (2009). Scalar Implicature and Local Pragmatics. Mind and Language 24 (1):51-79.
Yael Sharvit & Jon Gajewski (2012). In Defense of the Grammatical Approach to Local Implicatures. Natural Language Semantics 20 (1):31-57.
Added to index2009-12-07
Total downloads49 ( #88,657 of 1,911,401 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #32,815 of 1,911,401 )
How can I increase my downloads?