David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (3):351 – 369 (2008)
I examine the following question: Do actions require representations that are intrinsic to the action itself? Recent work by Mark Rowlands, Michael Wheeler, and Andy Clark suggests that actions may require a minimal form of representation. I argue that the various concepts of minimal representation on offer do not apply to action per se and that a non-representationalist account that focuses on dynamic systems of self-organizing continuous reciprocal causation at the sub-personal level is superior. I further recommend a scientific pragmatism regarding the concept of representation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
G. E. M. Anscombe (1957/2000). Intention. Harvard University Press.
Anthony Chemero (2000). Anti-Representationalism and the Dynamical Stance. Philosophy of Science 67 (4):625-647.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (2002). Intelligence Without Representation – Merleau-Ponty's Critique of Mental Representation the Relevance of Phenomenology to Scientific Explanation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (4):367-383.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (2007). Why Heideggerian Ai Failed and How Fixing It Would Require Making It More Heideggerian. Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):247 – 268.
Citations of this work BETA
Adrian John Tetteh Alsmith & Frédérique Vignemont (2012). Embodying the Mind and Representing the Body. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (1):1-13.
Leon de Bruin & Lena Kästner (2012). Dynamic Embodied Cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (4):541-563.
Marco Mirolli (2012). Representations in Dynamical Embodied Agents: Re-Analyzing a Minimally Cognitive Model Agent. Cognitive Science 36 (5):870-895.
Liesbet Quaeghebeur & Peter Reynaert (2010). Does the Need for Linguistic Expression Constitute a Problem to Be Solved? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):15-36.
Jonathan S. Spackman & Stephen C. Yanchar (2014). Embodied Cognition, Representationalism, and Mechanism: A Review and Analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44 (1):46-79.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Habel, Barbara Kaup & Stephanie Kelter (1997). Embodied Representations Are Part of a Grouping of Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):26-26.
Natika Newton (2001). The Role of Action Representations in the Dynamics of Embodied Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):58-59.
Glenn Carruthers (2008). Types of Body Representation and the Sense of Embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1302):1316.
Rick Grush (1997). The Architecture of Representation. Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):5-23.
Lawrence A. Shapiro (1997). Junk Representations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):345-361.
Elisabeth Pacherie (2011). Nonconceptual Representations for Action and the Limits of Intentional Control. Social Psychology 42 (1):67-73.
Zoltan Dienes & Josef Perner (2002). What Sort of Representation is Conscious? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):336-337.
Peter Lanz & David Mcfarland (1995). On Representation, Goals and Cognition. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (2):121 – 133.
Eric Dietrich & A. Markman (2003). Discrete Thoughts: Why Cognition Must Use Discrete Representations. Mind and Language 18 (1):95-119.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #31,339 of 1,413,334 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #30,081 of 1,413,334 )
How can I increase my downloads?