Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):764-765 (1999)
|Abstract||Dienes & Perner make three mistakes in their account of the “natural language meaning” of implicit-explicit knowledge: They fail to take the multiplicity of use of a concept seriously enough, they arbitrarily separate use of a concept and its conceptual structure, and they tend to tailor their analysis for use by the Representational Theory of Knowledge.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christian Lebiere & Dieter Wallach (1999). Implicit and Explicit Learning in a Hybrid Architecture of Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):772-773.
Warren J. Samuels (1995). Some Thoughts on Multiplicity. Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (2):287-292.
Kent Johnson (2004). From Impossible Words to Conceptual Structure: The Role of Structure and Processes in the Lexicon. Mind and Language 19 (3):334-358.
Ray S. Jackendoff (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.
David Plunkett (2011). Expressivism, Representation, and the Nature of Conceptual Analysis. Philosophical Studies 156 (1):15-31.
Robert Hanna (2008). Kantian Non-Conceptualism. Philosophical Studies 137 (1):41 - 64.
James A. Hampton (1999). Implicit and Explicit Knowledge: One Representational Medium or Many? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):769-770.
Peter C.-H. Cheng (2011). Probably Good Diagrams for Learning: Representational Epistemic Recodification of Probability Theory. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (3):475-498.
Josef Perner & Zoltan Dienes (1999). Deconstructing RTK: How to Explicate a Theory of Implicit Knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):790-801.
Andrew Haas (2000). Hegel and the Problem of Multiplicity. Northwestern University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #114,188 of 549,550 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?