Government and unemployment: Reply to De Long

Critical Review 12 (3):253-264 (1998)
Abstract De Long's criticisms of our explanation of unemployment patterns in the United States are empirically false. His assertion that we have the direction of causation reversed collapses in light of the lag between artificially high wages and unemployment. Nor are his claims about the nature of cyclical movements in productivity and real wages consistent with the data. Finally, his contention that the model we present does not work in the post?World War II era is, at best, misleading. The evidence shows with remarkable consistency that government attempts to prop up wages have caused twentieth?century increases in U.S. employment.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    J. Bradford de Long (1998). It Doesn't Work. Critical Review 12 (1-2):59-69.
    Citations of this work BETA
    Similar books and articles
    J. Bradford de Long (1998). It Doesn't Work. Critical Review 12 (1-2):59-69.
    Dimitria Electra Gatzia (2012). The Problem of Unemployment. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 7 (2):36-54.
    Michael Harrington (1982). Is Capitalism Still Viable? Journal of Business Ethics 1 (4):281 - 284.

    Monthly downloads

    Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    1 ( #306,223 of 1,088,883 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)


    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.