David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (1):40-62 (2011)
The following analysis demonstrates that G.H. Mead's understanding of human speech (what Mead often referred to as “the vocal gesture”) is remarkably consistent with today's interdisciplinary field that studies speech as a natural behavior with an evolutionary history. Mead seems to have captured major empirical and theoretical insights more than half a century before the contemporary field began to take shape. In that field the framework known as “Tinbergen's Four Questions,” developed in ecology to study naturally occurring behavior in nonhuman animals, has been an effective organizing framework for research on human speech. It is used in this paper to organize the comparison of Mead with contemporary scholars. The analysis concludes that Mead was, in a sense, “beyond” the Four Questions by recognizing the limitations of reductionist methods in understanding the nature of conscious phenomena, especially language. Mead's socially situated model of the nature of human speech makes him relevant to today's field where some see an undervaluation of the treatment of language as a social process
|Keywords||Mead human speech Tinbergen vocal gesture language|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Steven Pinker (2004). The Blank Slate. The Modern Denial of Human Nature. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 66 (4):765-767.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William M. O'Meara (1986). The Social Nature of Self and Morality for Husserl, Schutz, Marx, and Mead. Philosophy Research Archives 12:329-355.
Gert J. J. Biesta (1998). Mead, Intersubjectivity, and Education: The Early Writings. [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (2/3):73-99.
Owen Flanagan (1988). Book Review:G. H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-Examination of His Thought. G. H. Mead, Hans Joas. [REVIEW] Ethics 99 (1):180-.
H. Heath Bawden & Kevin S. Decker (2008). The Evolution of the Psychical Element, by George Herbert Mead (Dec. 1899–March 1900 or 1898–1899). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (3):480 - 507.
Mitchell Aboulafia, George Herbert Mead. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Marilyn Fischer (2008). Mead and the International Mind. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (3):pp. 508-531.
Kevin S. Decker (2008). The Evolution of the Psychical Element: George Herbert Mead at the University of Chicago: Lecture Notes by H. Heath Bawden 1899–1900: Introduction. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (3):pp. 469-479.
George Herbert Mead (1981). Selected Writings. University of Chicago Press.
Jean-Philippe Deranty (2005). The Loss of Nature in Axel Honneth's Social Philosophy. Rereading Mead with Merleau-Ponty. Critical Horizons 6 (1):153-181.
Robert Clowes (2007). A Self-Regulation Model of Inner Speech and its Role in the Organisation of Human Conscious Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (7):59-71.
Antony J. Puddephatt (2005). Mead has Never Been Modern: Using Meadian Theory to Extend the Constructionist Study of Technology. Social Epistemology 19 (4):357 – 380.
Irene Appelbaum (1999). The Dogma of Isomorphism: A Case Study From Speech Perception. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):S250-S259.
Added to index2011-12-09
Total downloads7 ( #304,000 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?