Incommensurability in Aristotle's Theory of Reciprocal Justice

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4):667 - 701 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In just proportional exchange, under Aristotle's theory of reciprocal justice, superior sharers in a community materially assist the weaker, and receive honour as a reward. Aristotle's economic thought is represented with a system of 18 formulae. Explained are: (1) What Aristotle means when he says that it is impossible for two sharers or their erga to be commensurable; (2) The extent to which the variables in Aristotle's proportions can be quantified. (3) What diagonal pairing ( ?ατ δ? ??τ?o? σ ??????) is; (4) How need makes sharers and their erga ?sufficiently' commensurable; and (5) Aristotle's theory of what is just in exchange

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-12

Downloads
61 (#258,521)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Human dignity and the logic of the gift.Jaco Kruger - 2017 - South African Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):516-524.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Justice as fairness.John Rawls - 1958 - Philosophical Review 67 (2):164-194.
Justice as Fairness.John Rawls - 1998 - In James Rachels (ed.), Ethical Theory 2: Theories About How We Should Live. Oxford University Press UK.
Γενουστησ.John Burnet - 1900 - The Classical Review 14 (08):393-394.
Aristotle’s Economic Thought.Scott Meikle - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (195):279-281.

View all 24 references / Add more references