David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
Traditionally, this puzzle has been solved in various ways. Aristotle, for example, distinguished between “accidental” and “essential” changes. Accidental changes are ones that don't result in a change in an objects' identity after the change, such as when a house is painted, or one's hair turns gray, etc. Aristotle thought of these as changes in the accidental properties of a thing. Essential changes, by contrast, are those which don't preserve the identity of the object when it changes, such as when a house burns to the ground and becomes ashes, or when someone dies. Armed with these distinctions, Aristotle would then say that, in the case of accidental changes, (1) and (2) are both false—a changing thing can really change one of its “accidental properties” and yet literally remain one and the same thing before and after the change
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2014). The Endurance/Perdurance Controversy is No Storm in a Teacup. Axiomathes 24 (4):463-482.
Similar books and articles
John Bowin (2010). Aristotle on the Unity of Change: Five Reductio Arguments in Physics Viii. Ancient Philosophy 30 (2):319-345.
Jacob Rosen (2012). Motion and Change in Aristotles Physics 5. 1. Phronesis 57 (1):63-99.
Greg Littmann (2012). Moments of Change. Acta Analytica 27 (1):29-44.
Mark Moyer (2006). Statues and Lumps: A Strange Coincidence? Synthese 148 (2):401 - 423.
Mauro Mariani (2000). Numerical Identity and Accidental Predication in Aristotle. Topoi 19 (2):99-110.
Tim Loughlin (2011). Souls and the Location of Time in Physics IV 14, 223a16–223a29. Apeiron 4 (4):307-325.
Teresa Robertson & Philip Atkins, Essential Vs. Accidental Properties. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
David S. Oderberg (2004). Temporal Parts and the Possibility of Change. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (3):686–708.
L. A. Paul (2006). In Defense of Essentialism. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):333–372.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads91 ( #48,285 of 1,934,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #91,777 of 1,934,369 )
How can I increase my downloads?