Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
|Abstract||Traditionally, this puzzle has been solved in various ways. Aristotle, for example, distinguished between “accidental” and “essential” changes. Accidental changes are ones that don't result in a change in an objects' identity after the change, such as when a house is painted, or one's hair turns gray, etc. Aristotle thought of these as changes in the accidental properties of a thing. Essential changes, by contrast, are those which don't preserve the identity of the object when it changes, such as when a house burns to the ground and becomes ashes, or when someone dies. Armed with these distinctions, Aristotle would then say that, in the case of accidental changes, (1) and (2) are both false—a changing thing can really change one of its “accidental properties” and yet literally remain one and the same thing before and after the change|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Bowin (2010). Aristotle on the Unity of Change: Five Reductio Arguments in Physics Viii. Ancient Philosophy 30 (2):319-345.
Jacob Rosen (2012). Motion and Change in Aristotles Physics 5. 1. Phronesis 57 (1):63-99.
Greg Littmann (2012). Moments of Change. Acta Analytica 27 (1):29-44.
Mark Moyer (2006). Statues and Lumps: A Strange Coincidence? Synthese 148 (2):401 - 423.
Tim Loughlin (2011). Souls and the Location of Time in Physics IV 14, 223a16–223a29. Apeiron 4 (4):307-325.
Teresa Robertson, Essential Vs. Accidental Properties. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
David S. Oderberg (2004). Temporal Parts and the Possibility of Change. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (3):686–708.
L. A. Paul (2006). In Defense of Essentialism. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):333–372.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #21,795 of 549,500 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,444 of 549,500 )
How can I increase my downloads?