David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1991)
There has been in recent years a plethora of defenses of theism from analytical philosophers such as Plantinga, Swinburne, and Alston. Richard Gale's important book is a critical response to these writings. New versions of cosmological, ontological, and religious experience arguments are critically evaluated, along with pragmatic arguments to justify faith on the grounds of its prudential or moral benefits. A special feature of the book is the discussion of the atheological argument that attempts to deduce a contradiction from the theist's way of conceiving of God's nature. In considering arguments for and against the existence of God, Gale is able to clarify many important philosophical concepts including exploration, time, free will, personhood, actuality, and the objectivity of experience.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$24.30 used (60% off) $41.98 direct from Amazon (31% off) $41.98 new (31% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BT102.G324 1991|
|ISBN(s)||0521457238 0521403006 9780521457231|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John Bishop & Ken Perszyk (2011). The Normatively Relativised Logical Argument From Evil. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):109-126.
Nicholas Everitt (2010). The Divine Attributes. Philosophy Compass 5 (1):78-90.
Luke Gelinas (2009). The Problem of Natural Evil I: General Theistic Replies. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):533-559.
Kai-man Kwan (2006). Can Religious Experience Provide Justification for the Belief in God? The Debate in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy. Philosophy Compass 1 (6):640–661.
Klaas J. Kraay (2008). Creation, Actualization and God's Choice Among Possible Worlds. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):854-872.
Similar books and articles
Jeremy Gwiazda (2009). Richard Swinburne, the Existence of God, and Principle P. Sophia 48 (4):393-398.
David Twetten (2006). On Which 'God' Should Be the Target of a 'Proof of God's Existence'. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:75-80.
Dean Zimmerman (2003). Richard Gale and the Free Will Defense. Philo 6 (1):78-113.
George I. Mavrodes (1970). The Rationality of Belief in God. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
Graham Robert Oppy (2006). Arguing About Gods. Cambridge University Press.
Charles E. Gutenson (1997). What Swinburne Should Have Concluded. Religious Studies 33 (3):243-247.
Graham Robert Oppy (1995). Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Swinburne (2004). The Existence of God. Oxford University Press.
Andrew V. Jeffrey (1996). Gale in Reference and Religious Experience. Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):91-112.
Richard Messer (1993). Does God's Existence Need Proof? Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #71,657 of 1,793,258 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #206,252 of 1,793,258 )
How can I increase my downloads?