David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (1):228-241 (2011)
This essay explores the ways in which a broadly pluralist outlook can help illuminate longstanding issues of constitutional theory and practice. It begins with a common-sense understanding of pluralism as the diversity of observed practices within a general category . It turns out that many assumptions Americans and others often make about constitutional essentials are valid only locally but not generically. The essay then turns to pluralism in a more technical and philosophical sense—specifically, the account of value pluralism adumbrated by Isaiah Berlin and developed by his followers. Section 3 sketches this version of pluralism, and section 4 brings it to bear on a range of familiar constitutional issues. In the process, a distinction emerges between, on the one hand, areas of variation among constitutions and, on the other, some general truths about political life that define core constitutional functions. The essay concludes with some brief reflections on the normative thrust of pluralist constitutional theory—in particular, a presumption in favor of the maximum accommodation of individual and group differences consistent with the maintenance of constitutional unity and civic order
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Nagel (1979/2012). Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press.
John Rawls (1971/2005). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Pierluigi Chiassoni (2011). Constitutionalism Out of a Positivist Mind Cast: The Garantismo Way. [REVIEW] Res Publica 17 (4):327-342.
Andras Szigeti (2010). Constitutionalism and Value Theory. In Andras Sajo & Renata Uitz (eds.), Constitutional Topography: Values and Constitutions. ELEVEN INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING.
Olaf Tans (2002). The Constitutional Theatre. Res Publica 8 (3):231-248.
Peter Langford (2012). The 'Postnational Condition' of Law and Politics: A Review of Nico Krisch's Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law by Peter Langford. [REVIEW] Jurisprudence 3 (1):295-306.
K. U. O. Ming-Sung (2010). Reconciling Constitutionalism with Power: Towards a Constitutional Nomos of Political Ordering. Ratio Juris 23 (3):390-410.
Preston King (1999). Constitutionalism and the Despatch‐Box Principle. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (2):29-58.
Sheron Fraser-Burgess (2009). Problems with a Weakly Pluralist Approach to Democratic Education. The Pluralist 4 (2):1 - 16.
Mark A. Graber (1998). Stephen M. Griffin, American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics:American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics. Ethics 108 (2):433-435.
William Galston (2011). Parents, Government, and Children: Authority Over Education in a Pluralist Liberal Democracy. Law and Ethics of Human Rights 5 (2):285-305.
Frederick Schauer (1992). The Right to Die as a Case Study in Third-Order Decisionmaking. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (6):573-587.
Robert Talisse (2004). Problems with Galston's Pluralist Liberalism. Southwest Philosophy Review 20 (1):221-229.
Eric T. Olson (2003). Lowe's Defence of Constitutionalism. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):92–95.
Hartry Field (2009). Pluralism in Logic. Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (2):342-359.
Added to index2012-08-28
Total downloads7 ( #209,391 of 1,410,030 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,059 of 1,410,030 )
How can I increase my downloads?