Reconsidering emancipatory education: Staging a conversation between Paulo Freire and Jacques Rancière
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Theory 62 (2):163-184 (2012)
In this essay Sarah Galloway considers emancipation as a purpose for education through examining the theories of Paulo Freire and Jacques Rancière. Both theorists are concerned with the prospect of distinguishing between education that might socialize people into what is taken to be an inherently oppressive society and education with emancipation as its purpose. Galloway reconstructs the theories in parallel, examining the assumptions made, the processes of oppression described, and the movements to emancipation depicted. In so doing, she argues that that the two theorists hold a common model for theorizing oppression and emancipation as educational processes, distinguished by the differing assumptions they each make about humanity, but that their theories ultimately have opposing implications for educational practices. Galloway further maintains that Freire and Rancière raise similar educational problems and concerns, both theorizing that the character of the relations among teachers, students, and educational materials is crucial to an emancipatory education. Galloway's approach allows discussion of some of the criticisms that have been raised historically about Freire's theory and how these might be addressed to some degree by Rancière's work. Taking the two theories together, she argues that the possibility for an emancipatory education cannot be ignored if education is to be considered as more than merely a process of passing down the skills and knowledge necessary in order to socialize people into current society.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tyson Edward Lewis (2009). Education in the Realm of the Senses: Understanding Paulo Freire's Aesthetic Unconscious Through Jacques Rancière. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (2):285-299.
Tyson Edward Lewis (2010). Paulo Freire's Last Laugh: Rethinking Critical Pedagogy's Funny Bone Through Jacques Rancière. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (5):635-648.
Peter Mayo (2004). Liberating Praxis: Paulo Freire's Legacy for Radical Education and Politics. Praeger Publishers.
Charles Bingham (2010). Settling No Conflict in the Public Place: Truth in Education, and in Rancièrean Scholarship. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (5):649-665.
Duncan P. Mercieca (2012). Initiating 'The Methodology of Jacques Rancière': How Does It All Start? Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (4):407-417.
Gert Biesta (2010). Learner, Student, Speaker: Why It Matters How We Call Those We Teach. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (5):540-552.
Peter Roberts (2000). Education, Literacy, and Humanization: Exploring the Work of Paulo Freire. Bergin & Garvey.
Peter Rule (2011). Bakhtin and Freire: Dialogue, Dialectic and Boundary Learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (9):924-942.
Jan Masschelein (2010). Hatred of Democracy ... And of the Public Role of Education. Introduction to the Special Issue on Jacques Rancière. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (5):509-522.
Maarten Simons & Jan Masschelein (2010). Hatred of Democracy ... And of the Public Role of Education? Introduction to the Special Issue on Jacques Rancière. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (5-6):509-522.
Charles Bingham (2002). On Paulo Freire's Debt to Psychoanalysis: Authority on the Side of Freedom. Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (6):447-464.
Caroline Pelletier (2012). Review of Charles Bingham and Gert Biesta, Jacques Rancière: Education, Truth, Emancipation. [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (6):613-619.
Gert Biesta & Charles Bingham (2012). Response to Caroline Pelletier's Review of Jacques Rancière: Education, Truth, Emancipation. Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (6):621-623.
Added to index2012-04-16
Total downloads22 ( #167,345 of 1,793,155 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #205,957 of 1,793,155 )
How can I increase my downloads?