Review of Alva noë's Action in Perception [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Times Literary Supplement (2005)
In Action in Perception, Alva Noë provides a persuasive account of the “enactive” approach to perception, according to which perception is not simply based on the processing of sensory information, or on the construction of internal representations, but is fundamentally shaped by the motor possibilities of the perceiving body. As John Dewey put it in 1896, in his essay, “The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Fred Keijzer (2007). Evolution in Action in Perception. Philosophical Psychology 20 (4):519 – 529.
Similar books and articles
Jason Ford (2009). Saving Time: How Attention Explains the Utility of Supposedly Superfluous Representations. Cognitive Critique 1 (1):101-114.
Michael Pace (2005). Review of Alva No, Action in Perception. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (11).
Mohan Matthen (2006). Review: Action in Perception. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (460):1160-1166.
Mark Rowlands (2006). Sensorimotor Activity. Psyche 12 (1).
Ryan Hickerson (2007). Perception as Knowing How to Act: Alva Noë's Action in Perception. Philosophical Psychology 20 (4):505 – 517.
Shimon Edelman (2006). Mostly Harmless: Review of Action in Perception by Alva Noë. [REVIEW] Artificial Life 12:183-186.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads65 ( #24,431 of 1,099,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #40,663 of 1,099,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?