The discursive and operational foundations of the national nanotechnology initiative in the history of the national science foundation
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 17 (2):pp. 174-211 (2009)
The National Science Foundation's (NSF) role in, and influence on, the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) can best be understood through an examination of the NSF's history. Because of the NSF's weakened position at its founding in 1950 and obstacles faced throughout its history, the NSF developed a discursive strategy that focuses on making a causal link between support for basic science and societal benefits, and an operational strategy focused on growing its constituency through infrastructural support. The hallmarks of both of these strategies are present in the NNI.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Matthew N. Eisler (2013). “The Ennobling Unity of Science and Technology”: Materials Sciences and Engineering, the Department of Energy, and the Nanotechnology Enigma. [REVIEW] Minerva 51 (2):225-251.
Stephen H. Cutcliffe, Christine M. Pense & Michael Zvalaren (2012). Framing the Discussion: Nanotechnology and the Social Construction of Technology--What STS Scholars Are Saying. NanoEthics 6 (2):81-99.
Matthew Kearnes (2013). On Guidebooks, Lists and Nanotechnology. Minerva 51 (4):513-519.
Similar books and articles
Carol Lynn Alpert (2011). Broadening and Deepening the Impact: A Theoretical Framework for Partnerships Between Science Museums and STEM Research Centres. Social Epistemology 23 (3):267-281.
Alfred Nordmann (2009). Invisible Origins of Nanotechnology: Herbert Gleiter, Materials Science, and Questions of Prestige. Perspectives on Science 17 (2):pp. 123-143.
Ronald Sandler & W. D. Kay (2006). The National Nanotechnology Initiative and the Social Good. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (4):675-681.
Melanie R. Roberts (2011). Realizing Societal Benefit From Academic Research: Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Broader Impacts Criterion. Social Epistemology 23 (3):199-219.
Robert Frodeman (2005). The Role of Humanities Policy in Public Science. Environmental Philosophy 2 (1):5-13.
Warren W. Burggren (2011). Implementation of the National Science Foundation's “Broader Impacts”: Efficiency Considerations and Alternative Approaches. Social Epistemology 23 (3):221-237.
Michael Gorman (2011). Doing Science, Technology and Society in the National Science Foundation. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):839-849.
Added to index2009-04-25
Total downloads16 ( #239,970 of 1,934,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #270,038 of 1,934,835 )
How can I increase my downloads?