British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (4):411-424 (2001)
|Abstract||I defend Hume's account of tragic pleasure against various objections. I examine his account of the emotions in order to clarify his "conversion theory". I also argue that Hume does not give us a theory of tragedy as an aesthetic genre, but rather elucidates the felt experience of a particular work of tragedy. I offer a partial reading of King Lear by way of illustration. Finally, I suggest that the experiences of aesthetic pleasure, and aesthetic sadness, share certain qualities. "Tragic pleasure" is possible, in part, because the pity of tragedy is realised through the pleasure of the aesthetic.|
|Keywords||Tragedy Hume Aesthetics Philosophy of Literature|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jennifer Anna Gosetti (2002). Tragedy and Truth in Heidegger and Jaspers. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):301-314.
Joseph Westfall (2003). Nietzsche and the Approach of Tragedy. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):333-350.
Julia Peters (2011). A Theory of Tragic Experience According to Hegel. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):85-106.
Aaron Smuts (2007). The Paradox of Painful Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 41 (3):59-77.
Dana LaCourse Munteanu (2012). Tragic Pathos: Pity and Fear in Greek Philosophy and Tragedy. Cambridge University Press.
Elisa Galgut (2009). Tragedy and Reparation. In Pedro Alexis Tabensky (ed.), The Positive Function of Evil. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ferrari (1999). Aristotle's Literary Aesthetics. Phronesis 44 (3):181-198.
G. R. F. Ferrari (1999). Aristotle's Literary Aesthetics. Phronesis 44 (3):181 - 198.
A. Merivale (2011). Mixed Feelings, Mixed Metaphors: Hume On Tragic Pleasure. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):259-269.
Stacie Friend (2007). The Pleasures of Documentary Tragedy. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):184-198.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads63 ( #14,669 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,093 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?