Journal for Communication and Culture 2 (1):68-87 (2012)
|Abstract||The aim of the current research was to determine the extent to which blogs serve as a public arena, wherein discourse conditions of equality, mutuality, and symmetry are amplified. Research questions were tested through a convenience sample from audience members (N=103) of the most popular sporting blog in Israel, and involved online surveys and an in-depth interview with the blog writer. Findings illustrate the process of forming a social community (virtual settlement/virtual community) through discussion and engagement, to a large extent similar to the ideal speech situations presented by Habermas. Indeed it seems that everyone is entitled to converse and engage in discourse; each person has the right to raise questions, question any claims made in the discourse and make any claim that comes to mind. Findings indicate that: specific topics receive disproportionate coverage, debate often leads to an overlapping collection of conversations and not to a single discussion, and not all topics are subjected to rational debate.|
|Keywords||sports blogging Israel public sphere|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Asaf Bar-Tura (2010). Arendt, Habermas and Facebook: Participation and Discourse in Cyber Public Spheres. Humanities and Technology Review 29:1-25.
Stine Lomborg (2012). Negotiating Privacy Through Phatic Communication. A Case Study of the Blogging Self. Philosophy and Technology 25 (3):415-434.
Codruţa Cuceu (2011). Milestones in the Critique of the Public Sphere: Dewey and Arendt. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):99-110.
John S. Brady (2004). No Contest? Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):331-354.
Hava Tirosh-Samuelson (2010). History and the Future of Science and Religion. Zygon 45 (2):448-461.
José Angel García Landa, Ensayando el blog - Qué aporta tu post (Essaying the blog - Your post's contribution).
Sue Thomas (2004). Reconfiguring the Public Sphere: Implications for Analyses of Educational Policy. British Journal of Educational Studies 52 (3):228 - 248.
Hsin-I. Liu (2006). The Impossibility of the Public. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:119-124.
Catriona McKenzie & Sarah Sorial (2011). The Limits of the Public Sphere: The Advocacy of Violence. Critical Horizons 12 (2):165-188.
David Randall (2011). The Prudential Public Sphere. Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (3):205-226.
Claudio Corradetti (2011). Transitional Justice and the Truth-Constraints of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (7):685-700.
Martin Kuhn (2007). Interactivity and Prioritizing the Human: A Code of Blogging Ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (1):18 – 36.
Jesús Vega Encabo & F. Javier Gil Martín (2007). Science as Public Sphere? Social Epistemology 21 (1):5 – 20.
Jens Steffek (2010). Public Accountability and the Public Sphere of International Governance. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (1):45-68.
Added to index2012-12-01
Total downloads9 ( #122,398 of 722,873 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,873 )
How can I increase my downloads?