Why Alston's Mystical Doxastic Practice Is Subjective [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):869 - 875 (1994)
Within each of the great religions there is a well established doxastic practice (DP) of taking experiential inputs consisting of apparent direct perceptions of God (M experiences) as giving prima facie justification, subject to defeat by overriders supplied by that religion, for belief outputs that God exists and is as he presents himself. (This DP is abbreviated as "MP.") William Alston's primary aim in his excellent book, Perceiving God, is to establish that we have epistemic justification for believing that MPs are reliable in that for the most part their belief outputs are true and moreover true of an objective or experience independent reality, unlike the belief outputs of the DPs based on sensations and feelings, along with the introspective DP whose intentional accusatives, although existing independently of being introspected, fail to be objective because they are themselves conscious states
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Adam Green (2009). Reading the Mind of God (Without Hebrew Lessons): Alston, Shared Attention, and Mystical Experience. Religious Studies 45 (4):455-470.
Evan Fales (1996). Scientific Explanations of Mystical Experiences, Part I: The Case of St. Teresa. Religious Studies 32 (2):143 - 163.
Adam Green (2009). Reading the Mind of God : Alston, Shared Attention, and Mystical Experience: Adam Green. Religious Studies 45 (4):455-470.
Joshua Seigal (2012). 'God Told Me to Do It': Sceptical Theism and Perceiving God. Religious Studies 48 (1):95 - 100.
Similar books and articles
William Hasker (2010). Alston on the Rationality of Doxastic Practices. Faith and Philosophy 27 (2):205-211.
Yehuda Gellman (2010). A Problem for the Christian Mystical Doxastic Practice. Philo 13 (1):23-28.
John Turri (2008). Practical and Epistemic Justification in Alston's Perceiving God. Faith and Philosophy 25 (3):290 - 299.
Peter Byrne (2000). Perceiving God and Realism. Philo 3 (2):74-88.
Julian Willard (2001). Alston's Epistemology of Religious Belief and the Problem of Religious Diversity. Religious Studies 37 (1):59-74.
Christopher J. Eberle (1998). The Autonomy and Explanation of Mystical Perception. Religious Studies 34 (3):299-316.
Robert Audi (1995). Perceptual Experience, Doxastic Practice, and the Rationality of Religious Commitment. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:1-18.
Rik Peels (2013). Belief-Policies Cannot Ground Doxastic Responsibility. Erkenntnis 78 (3):561-569.
Danny Frederick (2013). Doxastic Voluntarism: A Sceptical Defence. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (1):24-44.
William Coleman Williams, Perceptual Disanalogy: On the Alstonian Analogy Argument From Religious Experience.
Nikolaj Nottelmann (2006). The Analogy Argument for Doxastic Voluntarism. Philosophical Studies 131 (3):559 - 582.
Matthias Steup (2011). Belief, Voluntariness and Intentionality. Dialectica 65 (4):537-559.
Bruce Reichenbach (2012). Religious Experience as an Observational Epistemic Practice. Sophia 51 (1):1-16.
Michael B. Wakoff (1999). Alston's Practical Rationality Argument. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:247-284.
Added to index2010-12-05
Total downloads34 ( #95,542 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?