David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):71-91 (1999)
It was important to James’s philosophy, especially his doctrine of the will to believe, that we could believe at will. Toward this end he argues in The Principles of Psychology that attending to an idea is identical with believing it, which, in turn, is identical with willing that it be realized. Since willing is identical with believing and willing is an intentional action, it follows by Leibniz’s Law that believing also is an intentional action. This paper explores the problems with James’s thesis that attending=will=belief. An attempt is made to show that it has a salvageable core that is of considerable philosophical interest and importance
|Keywords||William James the will to believe|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nikolaj Nottelmann (2006). The Analogy Argument for Doxastic Voluntarism. Philosophical Studies 131 (3):559 - 582.
Marianne Janack (2004). Changing the Epistemological and Psychological Subject: William James's Psychology Without Borders. Metaphilosophy 35 (1/2):160-77.
Nikolaj Nottelman (2007). Is Believing at Will 'Conceptually Impossible'? Acta Analytica 22 (2):105-124.
Maurice Hamington (2010). The Will to Care: Performance, Expectation, and Imagination. Hypatia 25 (3):675 - 695.
Nikolaj Nottelmann (2006). The Analogy Argument for Doxastic Voluntarism. Philosophical Studies 131 (3):559-582.
Similar books and articles
G. William Barnard (2005). Pt. 3. James and Mysticism. For an Engaged Reading : William James and the Varieties of Postmodern Religious Experience / Grace M. Jantzen ; Asian Religions and Mysticism : The Legacy of William James in the Study of Religions / Richard King ; James and Freud on Mysticism / Robert A. Segal ; Mystical Assessments : Jamesian Reflections on Spiritual Judgments. [REVIEW] In Jeremy R. Carrette (ed.), William James and the Varieties of Religious Experience: A Centenary Celebration. Routledge
Jaime Nubiola (2000). Ludwig Wittgenstein and William James. Streams of William James 2 (3):2-4.
Robert J. O'Connell (1997). William James on the Courage to Believe. Fordham University Press.
Stephen F. Barker (1999). James' “The Will To Believe”. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:69-76.
Mathias Girel (2010). William James, l'Attitude Empiriste (William James, the Empiricist Stance) (Review). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (3):503-508.
Brian Zamulinski (2002). A Re-Evaluation of Clifford and His Critics. Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (3):437-457.
Jennifer Welchman (2006). William James's "the Will to Believe" and the Ethics of Self-Experimentation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (2):229-241.
Graham Bird (1986). William James. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Max Carl Otto (ed.) (1942). William James. Madison, the University of Wisconsin Press.
Richard M. Gale (1999). William James and the Willfulness of Belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):71 - 91.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads55 ( #75,409 of 1,793,264 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #169,500 of 1,793,264 )
How can I increase my downloads?