David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (2):pp. 252-253 (2010)
This book is essential reading for all interpreters of William James. Too often they, myself included, sadly neglect the historical setting of his work. Bordogna's erudite and often brilliant scholarly forays in the history of science and intellectual history, which make effective use of concepts from the sociology of science and the history of disciplinarity, go a long way to compensate for this deficiency.This is a real book, and a bold one at that, because it has an exciting underlying thesis that runs throughout, everything being an illustration and deepening of it; however, the numerous formulations fluctuate between a weak and strong version. The following quotations present the weak thesis: James' "general philosophy, properly conducted, would facilitate new modes of social relationships and new ways of collaboration and communication among the diverse kind of inquirers. These new modes of engagement would bring together philosophers, psychologists, practitioners of the other sciences, and people with practical concerns, making them into a community that would engage in cross-disciplinary and cross-divisional discussion" ; "James located philosophers in interstitial knowledge spaces, and made philosophy … into a form of mediation between diverse modes of inquiry"
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Charlene H. Seigfried (1992). William James's Concrete Analysis of Experience. The Monist 75 (4):538-550.
Richard M. Gale (2004). The Philosophy of William James: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Russell B. Goodman (2000). Review: Richard M. Gale the Divided Self of William James. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999). Pp. 364. $59.95. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 36 (2):227-245.
James D. Proctor & David Marshall Smith (eds.) (1999). Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain. Routledge.
Antoine Bailly & Lay James Gibson (eds.) (2004). Applied Geography. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
J. Pickles (1985). Phenomenology, Science, and Geography: Spatiality and the Human Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Graham Bird (2002). Review: The Divided Self of William James. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (441):100-103.
Max Carl Otto (ed.) (1942). William James. Madison, the University of Wisconsin Press.
Francesca Bordogna (2008). William James at the Boundaries: Philosophy, Science, and the Geography of Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
Ruth Anna Putnam (2009). Review of Francesca Bordogna, William James at the Boundaries: Philosophy, Science, and the Geography of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).
Added to index2010-03-31
Total downloads247 ( #11,235 of 1,938,538 )
Recent downloads (6 months)49 ( #10,291 of 1,938,538 )
How can I increase my downloads?