Defending semantic realism
| Abstract | Copyright © 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesFabio Gironi (2012). The Theological Hijacking of Realism: Critical Realism in 'Science and Religion'. Journal of Critical Realism 11 (1):40-75.
John H. Spencer (2007). Defending Realism: Reflections on Karl Rogers's Metaphysics of Experimental Physics. Journal of Critical Realism 6 (1).
H. G. Callaway (1990). Review of Fodor, Psychosemantics. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 33 (2):251-59..
Heimir Geirsson (2005). Moral Twin-Earth and Semantic Moral Realism. Erkenntnis 62 (3):353 - 378.
Panu Raatikainen (2010). The Semantic Realism/Anti-Realism Dispute and Knowledge of Meanings. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 5:1-13.
Alexander Miller (2003). The Significance of Semantic Realism. Synthese 136 (2):191 - 217.
Denise Gamble (2003). Manifestability and Semantic Realism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):1–23.
David Davies (1987). Horwich on 'Semantic' and 'Metaphysical' Realism. Philosophy of Science 54 (4):539-557.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-07-27Total downloads9 ( #114,188 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
