Hein van den Berg. Kant on Proper Science: Biology in the Critical Philosophy and the Opus postumum. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015. Pp. 283. $129.00 ; $99.00 [Book Review]

Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (2):364-367 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/682377

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Kant on Proper Science: Biology in the Critical Philosophy and the Opus postumum.Hein van den Berg - 2014 - Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.
Kant’s conception of proper science.Hein van den Berg - 2011 - Synthese 183 (1):7-26.
Kant's conception of proper science.Hein Berg - 2011 - Synthese 183 (1):7-26.
Kant on Vital Forces: Metaphysical concerns versus Scientific Practice.Hein van den Berg - 2009 - In Ernst-Otto Jan Onnasch (ed.), Kants Philosophie der Natur: Ihre Entwicklung Im Opus Postumum Und Ihre Wirkung. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 115-135.
Chemistry in Kant’s Opus Postumum.Michael Bennett McNulty - 2016 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (1):64-95.
The Post-Critical Kant: Understanding the Critical Philosophy Through the Opus Postumum.Bryan Hall - 2014 - New York: Routledge.
The Wolffian roots of Kant’s teleology.Hein van den Berg - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):724-734.
Kant's Opus Postumum and McDowell's Critique of Kant.Martin Shuster - 2014 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (4):427-444.
Friedrich Stadler (ed.): The present situation in the philosophy of science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, 422pp, €139,95 HB. [REVIEW]Stathis Psillos - 2010 - Metascience 20 (2):415-416.
Wolff and Kant on Scientific Demonstration and Mechanical Explanation.Hein van den Berg - 2013 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95 (2):178-205.
Kants Transzendentalphilosophie des Opus postumum gegen den transzendentalen Idealismus Schellings und Spinozas.Ernst-Otto Onnasch - 2009 - In Ernst-Otto Jan Onnasch (ed.), Kants Philosophie der Natur: Ihre Entwicklung Im Opus Postumum Und Ihre Wirkung. Walter de Gruyter.
The Role of the Organism in the Transcendental Philosophy of Kant’s Opus postumum.Ernst-Otto Onnasch - 2014 - In Eric Watkins & Ina Goy (eds.), Kant's Theory of Biology. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 239-256.
Idealismo e realismo nella ricezione neokantiana Dell ’Opus Postumum: Série 2 / Idealism and Realism in the Neokantian Reception of the Opus postumum‘.Giovanni Pietro Basile - 2008 - Kant E-Prints 3:103-114.
Kant's final synthesis: an essay on the Opus postumum.Eckart Förster - 2000 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
María de Paz and Robert DiSalle, eds. Poincaré, Philosopher of Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014. Pp. xiv+191. $179.00. [REVIEW]Marij van Strien - 2015 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (1):183-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
31 (#488,695)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references