David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (3):556-573 (2014)
A central question, if not the central question, of philosophy of perception is whether sensory states have a nature similar to thoughts about the world, whether they are essentially representational. According to the content view, at least some of our sensory states are, at their core, representations with contents that are either accurate or inaccurate. Tyler Burge’s Origins of Objectivity is the most sustained and sophisticated defense of the content view to date. His defense of the view is problematic in several ways. The most significant problem is that his approach does not sit well with mainstream perceptual psychology.
|Keywords||Burge perception representation sensation Origins of Objectivity constancy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Marr (1982). Vision. Freeman.
Jerry A. Fodor (2008). LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford University Press.
Peter Carruthers (2006). The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter Schulte (2015). Perceptual Representations: A Teleosemantic Answer to the Breadth-of-Application Problem. Biology and Philosophy 30 (1):119-136.
Frank Hofmann & Peter Schulte (2014). The Structuring Causes of Behavior: Has Dretske Saved Mental Causation? Acta Analytica 29 (3):267-284.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Gauker (2012). What Do Your Senses Says? On Burge's Theory of Perception. Grazer Philosophische Studien 85 (1):311-323.
Tyler Burge (2010). Origins of Objectivity. OUP Oxford.
John McDowell (2011). Tyler Burge on Disjunctivism. Philosophical Explorations 13 (3):243-255.
Bence Nanay (2015). Perceptual Representation / Perceptual Content. In Mohan Matthen (ed.), Oxford Handbook for the Philosophy of Perception. Oxford University Press 153-167.
Tyler Burge (2009). Perceptual Objectivity. Philosophical Review 118 (3):285-324.
Nicholas Silins (2012). Explaining Perceptual Entitlement. Erkenntnis 76 (2):243-261.
Fred Dretske (2003). Burge on Mentalistic Explanations, or Why I Am Still Epiphobic. In Martin Hahn & B. Ramberg (eds.), Reflections and Replies: Essays on the Philosophy of Tyler Burge. MIT Press
Tyler Burge (2003). Perceptual Entitlement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):503-548.
Peter J. Graham (2014). The Function of Perception. In Abrol Fairweather (ed.), Virtue Scientia: Bridges between Virtue Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Synthese Library 13-31.
Andrew Woodfield (1982). Thought and the Social Community. Inquiry 25 (December):435-50.
Tyler Burge (2003). Perception. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 84 (1):157-167.
Agustín Vicente (2012). Burge on Representation and Biological Function. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):125-133.
Tyler Burge (2003). Perceptual Entitlement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):503-48.
Added to index2012-06-24
Total downloads710 ( #745 of 1,790,117 )
Recent downloads (6 months)71 ( #13,558 of 1,790,117 )
How can I increase my downloads?