Engaging rational discrimination: Exploring reasons for placing regulatory constraints on decision support systems
Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1) (2010)
|Abstract||In the future systems of ambient intelligence will include decision support systems that will automate the process of discrimination among people that seek entry into environments and to engage in search of the opportunities that are available there. This article argues that these systems must be subject to active and continuous assessment and regulation because of the ways in which they are likely to contribute to economic and social inequality. This regulatory constraint must involve limitations on the collection and use of information about individuals and groups. The article explores a variety of rationales or justifications for establishing these limits. It emphasizes the unintended consequences that flow from the use of these systems as the most compelling rationale.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Steven A. Cavaleri (2005). Systems Thinking for Knowledge. World Futures 61 (5):378 – 396.
István Borgulya (1999). Two Examples of Decision Support in the Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3).
Jennifer Kuzma & John C. Besley (2008). Ethics of Risk Analysis and Regulatory Review: From Bio- to Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 2 (2).
E. Bellucci & J. Zeleznikow, Trade-Off Manipulations in the Development of Negotiation Decision Support Systems.
Omar E. M. Khalil (1993). Artificial Decision-Making and Artificial Ethics: A Management Concern. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):313 - 321.
Patrick Humphreys & Garrick Jones (2006). The Evolution of Group Decision Support Systems to Enable Collaborative Authoring of Outcomes. World Futures 62 (3):193 – 222.
Emilia Bellucci & John Zeleznikow (2005). Developing Negotiation Decision Support Systems That Support Mediators: A Case Study of the Family_winner System. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):233-271.
Kieran Mathieson (2007). Towards a Design Science of Ethical Decision Support. Journal of Business Ethics 76 (3):269 - 292.
John Zeleznikow (2002). An Australian Perspective on Research and Development Required for the Construction of Applied Legal Decision Support Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4).
Added to index2009-06-13
Total downloads9 ( #114,063 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?