The study of indian epistemology: Questions of method—a reply to Matthew dasti and Stephen H. Phillips
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy East and West 60 (4):541-550 (2010)
I would like to thank the editors of Philosophy East and West for courteously asking me if I would like to respond to Matthew Dasti and Stephen Phillips' very thoughtful remarks about the review I wrote of Phillips' translation and commentary on the pratyakṣa chapter of Gaṅgeśa's Tattvacintāmaṇi, prepared in collaboration with N. S. Ramanuja Tatacharya (Phillips and Tatacharya 2004). Let me begin by reaffirming what I said at the beginning of my review, that the book is "a monumental and momentous achievement, one whose importance cannot be understated." I have indeed enormous admiration for the magnitude of their achievement and respect for the contribution they have made through this translation to the field of ..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Matthew Dasti & Stephen H. Phillips (2010). Pramāṇa Are Factive— A Response to Jonardon Ganeri. Philosophy East and West 60 (4):535-540.
Matthew Dasti Stephen H. Phillips (2010). Pramāṇa Are Factive —: A Response to Jonardon Ganeri. Philosophy East and West 60 (4):535-540.
Stephen H. Phillips & N. S. Ramanuja Tatacharya (2000). Discourse on Perceptual Presentation of Something as Other Than What It Is. Journal of Indian Philosophy 28 (5/6):567-650.
Stephen H. Phillips (2004). Epistemology of Perception: Ganṅgeśa's Tattvacintāmaṇi: Jewel of Reflection on the Truth (About Epistemology), the Perception Chapter (Pratyakṣa-Khaṇḍa). American Institute of Buddhist Studies.
Stephen H. Phillips (2001). Semantic Powers: Meaning and the Means of Knowing in Classical Indian Philosophy. Jonardon Ganeri. Mind 110 (439):749-753.
Peter Marton (2000). The Murderer Returns: A Reply on Zombies to Jamie Phillips. Southwest Philosophy Review 16 (2):195-200.
Matthew R. Dasti (2012). An Introduction to Indian Philosophy by Bina Gupta (Routledge 2012). [REVIEW] Religious Studies Review 38 (3):190.
Arindam Chakrabarti (2001). Reply to Stephen Phillips. Philosophy East and West 51 (1):114-115.
Stephen Phillips (forthcoming). Epistemology in Classical Indian Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Johannes Bronkhorst (2011). A Note on Nirvikalpaka and Savikalpaka Perception. Philosophy East and West 61 (2):373-379.
Mikel Burley (2012). D. Z. Phillips' Contemplations on Religion and Literature. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (1):21-37.
Stephen H. Phillips (2010). Hartshorne and Indian Panentheism. Sophia 49 (2):285-295.
Stephen H. Phillips (2001). There's Nothing Wrong with Raw Perception: A Response to Chakrabarti's Attack on Nyāya's "Nirvikalpaka Pratyakṣa". Philosophy East and West 51 (1):104-113.
Stephen H. Phillips (2002). Gaṅgeśa on the Upādhi, the "Inferential Undercutting Condition": Introduction, Translation, and Explanation. Indian Council of Philosophical Research.
Added to index2010-10-21
Total downloads39 ( #69,387 of 1,700,257 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #128,702 of 1,700,257 )
How can I increase my downloads?