David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for Communication and Culture 2 (2):176-192 (2012)
This paper studies the media phenomenon of “public intellectual” in China and tries to show it entails not only the result of the intervention of mass production of cultural field by the small scale production of intellectual field, but also the necessity of acquiring symbolic capital on behalf of the dominant class of the political-economic field. The engagements of Chinese public intellectuals are socially divided rather than publicly oriented, and the media field under the domination of the political-economic field working as a cultural intermediary inclines to support neo-liberalist discourses about them. Bourdieu’s theories of champs, Habitus and capitals are applied to analyze the media phenomenon of public intellectuals in Chinese context and the paper addresses this question in three aspects. First, the emergence of public intellectuals in the mass production of cultural field and how its power relationship with different champs including media field and political-economic field threatens the autonomy of intellectual for public engagement. Second, the competitions of accumulating capitals by intellectuals in the media field and social field, and how it affects their unified engagement. Third, how the practice of Habitus by public intellectuals on the media either improve or declines their competition for symbolic capitals, and the potential antagonism caused by the dislocation of the practice of their habitus with some groups’ positions in the social field. This paper uses mainly ethnography and textual analysis to study the public intellectuals’ media program and text, and online research is applied to study the audience reaction in the social field.
|Keywords||public intellectual field Habitus cultural capitals symbolic capital|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kayhan P. Parsi & Karen E. Geraghty (2004). The Bioethicist as Public Intellectual. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):17 – 23.
Patrick Baert (2012). Positioning Theory and Intellectual Interventions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (3):304-324.
James Glen Stovall & Patrick R. Cotter (1992). The Public Plays Reporter: Attitudes Toward Reporting on Public Officials. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 7 (2):97 – 106.
Kevin Stoker & Megan Stoker (2012). The Paradox of Public Interest: How Serving Individual Superior Interests Fulfill Public Relations' Obligation to the Public Interest. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 27 (1):31-45.
Deana A. Rohlinger (2007). American Media and Deliberative Democratic Processes. Sociological Theory 25 (2):122 - 148.
Diana Ingenhoff & A. Martina Koelling (2012). Media Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility of Media Organizations: An International Comparison. Business Ethics 21 (2):154-167.
Thomas H. Bivins (1989). Are Public Relations Texts Covering Ethics Adequately? Journal of Mass Media Ethics 4 (1):39 – 52.
Jon Dovey (2006). Game Cultures: Computer Games as New Media. Open University Press.
James H. Bissland & Terry Lynn Rentner (1989). Education's Role in Professionalizing Public Relations: A Progress Report. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 4 (1):92 – 105.
Richard B. Miller (1997). Review: Religion and the American Public Intellectual. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (2):367 - 392.
Asaf Bar-Tura (2010). Arendt, Habermas and Facebook: Participation and Discourse in Cyber Public Spheres. Humanities and Technology Review 29:1-25.
Bruce Garrison & Sigman Splichal (1994). Reporting on Private Affairs of Candidates: A Study of Newspaper Practices. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (3):169 – 183.
Irène Perrin (2007). The Role of the Mass Media As Stakeholders In Conferring Corporate Legitimacy. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:467-469.
Zach VanderVeen (2010). What Makes Media Public? Dealing with the "Current Economic Crisis". Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (2):171-191.
Added to index2012-12-01
Total downloads6 ( #230,125 of 1,410,123 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,589 of 1,410,123 )
How can I increase my downloads?