Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Lewis et al. recently demonstrated that additional assumptions such as preparation independence are always necessary to rule out a psi-epistemic model, in which the quantum state is not uniquely determined by the underlying physical state. Here we point out that these authors ignored the important work of Aharonov, Anandan and Vaidman on protective measurements, and their conclusion, which is based only on an analysis of conventional projective measurements, is not true|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Shan Gao (2008). A Quantum Theory of Consciousness. Minds and Machines 18 (1):39-52.
A. Amann & H. Atmanspacher (1998). Fluctuations in the Dynamics of Single Quantum Systems. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 29 (2):151-182.
Matthew Donald (1992). A Priori Probability and Localized Observers. Foundations of Physics 22 (9):1111-1172.
John Forge (1996). Explanation and the Quantum State. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (3):203 – 215.
C. Lehner (1997). What It Feels Like to Be in a Superposition, and Why: Consciousness and the Interpretation of Everett's Quantum Mechanics. Synthese 110 (2):191-216.
GianCarlo Ghirardi & Philip Pearle (1990). Dynamical Reduction Theories: Changing Quantum Theory so the Statevector Represents Reality. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:19 - 33.
Thomas Breuer (1996). Subjective Decoherence in Quantum Measurements. Synthese 107 (1):1 - 17.
J. V. Corbett & T. Durt (2010). An Intuitionistic Model of Single Electron Interference. Studia Logica 95 (1/2):81 - 100.
Added to index2012-11-25
Total downloads20 ( #68,365 of 739,052 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #8,800 of 739,052 )
How can I increase my downloads?