Comment on "How to protect the interpretation of the wave function against protective measurements" by Jos Uffink

Abstract
It is shown that Uffink's attempt to protect the interpretation of the wave function against protective measurements fails due to several errors in his arguments.
Keywords wave function  protective measurement
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Only published papers are available at libraries
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Shan Gao (2013). On Uffink's Criticism of Protective Measurements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (4):513-518.
    Jos Uffink (2013). Reply to Gao's “On Uffink's Criticism of Protective Measurements”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (4):519-523.
    Similar books and articles
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-12-18

    Total downloads

    39 ( #37,013 of 1,089,047 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    12 ( #9,280 of 1,089,047 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.