David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):241-255 (2013)
Prior research on sustainability in business often assumes that decisions on social and environmental investments are made for instrumental reasons, which points to causal relationships between corporate financial performance and corporate social and environmental commitment. In other words, social or environmental commitment should predict higher financial performance. The theoretical premise of sustainability, however, is based on a systems perspective, which implies a tighter integration between corporate financial performance and corporate commitment to social and environmental issues. In this paper, we describe the important theoretical differences between an instrumental and integrative logic in managing business sustainability. We test the presence of each logic using data from 738 firms over 13 years and find evidence of integrative logic applied in business.
|Keywords||Business sustainability Corporate social commitment Corporate environmental commitment Instrumental approach Integrative approach Simultaneous decision-making|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (1971/2005). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Michael L. Barnett (2005). Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:287-292.
James E. Mattingly & Shawn L. Berman (2006). Measurement of Corporate Social Action Discovering Taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini Ratings Data. Business and Society 45 (1):20-46.
Pat Auger & Timothy M. Devinney (2007). Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions. Journal of Business Ethics 76 (4):361 - 383.
Roberto Garcia-Castro, Miguel A. Ariño & Miguel A. Canela (2010). Does Social Performance Really Lead to Financial Performance? Accounting for Endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics 92 (1):107 - 126.
Citations of this work BETA
Tobias Hahn, Jonatan Pinkse, Lutz Preuss & Frank Figge (2015). Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 127 (2):297-316.
David R. Jones (forthcoming). The ‘Biophilic Organization’: An Integrative Metaphor for Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics.
Christian Voegtlin & Andreas Georg Scherer (forthcoming). Responsible Innovation and the Innovation of Responsibility: Governing Sustainable Development in a Globalized World. Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
Marcel Van Marrewijk & Teun W. Hardjono (2003). European Corporate Sustainability Framework for Managing Complexity and Corporate Transformation. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3):121 - 132.
Marcel van Marrewijk & Teun W. Hardjono (2003). European Corporate Sustainability Framework for Managing Complexity and Corporate Transformation. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):121-132.
Sungchul Choi & Alex Ng (2011). Environmental and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability and Price Effects on Consumer Responses. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):269-282.
Alexandro Kleine & Michael von Hauff (2009). Sustainability-Driven Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of the Integrative Sustainability Triangle. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):517 - 533.
Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge (2011). Beyond the Bounded Instrumentality in Current Corporate Sustainability Research: Toward an Inclusive Notion of Profitability. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (3):325-345.
David L. Ferguson (2009). Drivers and Inhibitors of Corporate Sustainability Performance in Practice. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:121-132.
Marcus Wagner & Joris Blom (2011). The Reciprocal and Non-Linear Relationship of Sustainability and Financial Performance. Business Ethics 20 (4):418-432.
Marta de La Cuesta-González, María Jesús Muñoz-Torres & María Ángeles Fernández-Izquierdo (2006). Analysis of Social Performance in the Spanish Financial Industry Through Public Data. A Proposal. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (3):289 - 304.
Bert Scholtens (2006). Finance as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (1):19 - 33.
Marcel van Marrewijk & Marco Werre (2003). Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):107-119.
Marcel Van Marrewijk & Marco Werre (2003). Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3):107 - 119.
Morgan P. Miles & Jeffrey G. Covin (2000). Environmental Marketing: A Source of Reputational, Competitive, and Financial Advantage. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 23 (3):299 - 311.
Jacob Park (2007). China's Rapid Industrialization and its Sustainability Discontents. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:365-375.
Peter A. Stanwick & Sarah D. Stanwick (1998). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2):195-204.
Marcel Van Marrewijk, Iris Wuisman, Wim De Cleyn, Joanna Timmers, Virgilio Panapanaan & Lassi Linnanen (2004). A Phase-Wise Development Approach to Business Excellence: Towards an Innovative, Stakeholder-Oriented Assessment Tool for Organizational Excellence and CSR. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 55 (2):83-98.
Added to index2012-02-15
Total downloads30 ( #103,674 of 1,724,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,625 of 1,724,748 )
How can I increase my downloads?