David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (1):97-114 (2004)
This paper demonstrates that when the concept of ethicalpolitical responsibility is taken in its modern sense as a decision or outcome based on the protocols of reason, responsibility is neither simply possible nor simply impossible. Paradoxically, it appeals to a demand that it cannot fulfil; responsibility is thus (im)possible. Moreover, insofar as a deconstructive demonstration of this aporia is itself a response to reasons own demand, deconstruction cannot be characterized as simply responsible or irresponsible. Rather, deconstruction inscribes itself as the interior limit of the order of ethics, of responsibility, as such. Deconstruction is thus characterized best as an (ir)responsible interrogation of the very principle of reason to which political philosophers such as Habermas appeal when they invoke responsibility. To this extent deconstruction enacts the strange responsibility of interrogating critically precisely what is deemed just. Key Words: critique deconstruction Derrida Enlightenment ethics Habermas justice modernity reason responsibility.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Vallentyne (2006). Hurley on Justice and Responsibility. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):433 - 438.
Gert Biesta (2010). 'This is My Truth, Tell Me Yours'. Deconstructive Pragmatism as a Philosophy for Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (7):710-727.
Annika Thiem (2008). Unbecoming Subjects: Judith Butler, Moral Philosophy, and Critical Responsibility. Fordham University Press.
Nicholas Royle (2003). Jacques Derrida. Routledge.
Patrick O'Connor (2007). Derrida's Worldly Responsibility: The Opening Between 'Faith” and the “Sacred”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):303-334.
Honglim Ryu (2001). Ethics of Ambiguity and Irony: Jacques Derrida and Richard Rorty. Human Studies 24 (1-2):5-28.
Carl Knight (2011). Responsibility, Desert, and Justice. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
Carl Knight (2010). Justice and the Grey Box of Responsibility. Theoria 57 (124):86-112.
Thomas Keenan (1997). Fables of Responsibility: Aberrations and Predicaments in Ethics and Politics. Stanford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #179,168 of 1,102,039 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #306,606 of 1,102,039 )
How can I increase my downloads?