David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):486-505 (2010)
Although the traditional society in China was not necessarily a society of equality, and the classical Confucianism did not speak much about the principle of universal equality, in modern times, in the midst of a transformation of value systems, people still find correlating sources within the Confucian tradition that is connected to the modern idea of equality. This essay makes a detailed study on this correlation and points out that ancient Chinese society and the western feudal society are different in terms of social systems and education systems. For example, China has the imperial examination but no patrimonial aristocracy. Confucianism opposed the huge gap between the poor and the rich, and this idea has become a modern tradition in the ideal of great harmony under the sky, especially in Kang Youwei’s 康有为 Datong Shu 大同书 (Book of Great Harmony). There were also some elements of agricultural socialism and equalitarianism in traditional Confucianism. The potential idea of equality (or reciprocity) in friendship, embodied in the principle of Confucian ethics of the Three Bonds and the Five Relations, is explored and explained in a modern way. The theory that the sages are equal with the masses, which originated from the theory of human being’s intrinsic goodness, may be directly connected with modern principle of equality. The modern transformation of equality is both political and ethical. The former is to struggle for individual rights; the latter is to establish moral subjectivity. Therefore, equality between sages and the masses manifests modernity. Like the epistemic subjectivity, which could not be discussed without referring to group-individual relationship, the moral subjectivity also contains a consciousness of equality.
|Keywords||equality Confucianism value the way of friendship|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Aristotle (2006/1998). Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.
Aristotle (2004). The Nicomachean Ethics. Penguin Books.
Wing-tsit Chan (1963). A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.,Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chenyang Li (2012). Equality and Inequality in Confucianism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (3):295-313.
A. T. Nuyen (2001). Confucianism and the Idea of Equality. Asian Philosophy 11 (2):61 – 71.
Ranjoo Seodu Herr (2010). Confucian Democracy and Equality. Asian Philosophy 20 (3):261-282.
Xiangjun Li (2007). An Explanation of the Confucian Idea of Difference. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):488-502.
Wenhua Chai (2006). Traditional Confucianism in Modern China: Ma Yifu's Ethical Thought. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):366-381.
Roger Fjellstrom (2002). Equality Does Not Entail Equality Across Species. Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352.
Vanda Fiorillo (2013). Der Andere ,,ut aeque homo: Gleichheit und Menschenwurde in der politischen Anthropologie Samuel Pufendorfs. Archiv Fuer Rechts- Und Sozialphilosphie 99 (1):11-28.
Russell Hardin (1999). From Bodo Ethics to Distributive Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (4):399-413.
Wojciech Sadurski (2008). Equality and Legitimacy. Oxford University Press.
Harry Brighouse (2007). Equality of Opportunity and Complex Equality: The Special Place of Schooling. [REVIEW] Res Publica 13 (2):147-158.
Tomer Lotan (2010). Equality Once Again: Social Polic and the Idea of Levelling Down. Dissertation, London School of Economics
Added to index2010-12-04
Total downloads27 ( #67,794 of 1,100,004 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #90,379 of 1,100,004 )
How can I increase my downloads?