David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In A. J. Canas & J. D. Novak (eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology Proc. of the Second Int. Conference on Concept Mapping (2006)
Concept maps are found to be useful in eliciting knowledge, meaningful learning, evaluation of understanding and in studying the nature of changes taking place during cognitive development, particularly in the classroom. Several experts have claimed the effectiveness of this tool for learning science. We agree with the claim, but the effectiveness will improve only if we gradually introduce a certain amount of discipline in constructing the maps. The discipline is warranted, we argue, because science thrives to be an unambiguous and rigorously structured body of knowledge. Since learning science may be seen as a process where a novice is expected to be transformed into an expert, we use the context of learning science for making the proposal. Further, we identify certain anomalies in the evaluation of concept maps, and suggest that the evaluation should be based on semantics of the linking words (relation types) and not on graphical criteria alone.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mariko Moher, Lisa Feigenson & Justin Halberda (2010). A One-to-One Bias and Fast Mapping Support Preschoolers' Learning About Faces and Voices. Cognitive Science 34 (5):719-751.
Michael Tomasello (2001). Could We Please Lose the Mapping Metaphor, Please? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1119-1120.
Michael Luntley (2008). Conceptual Development and the Paradox of Learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):1-14.
Anthony E. Kelly (2011). Can Cognitive Neuroscience Ground a Science of Learning? Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):17-23.
Knud Illeris (ed.) (2009). Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists -- In Their Own Words. Routledge.
Kenneth R. Koedinger, Albert T. Corbett & Charles Perfetti (2012). The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning. Cognitive Science 36 (5):757-798.
Nagarjuna G. (2009). Collaborative Creation of Teaching Learning Sequences and an Atlas of Knowledgge. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal Online 3 (3):23.
Rosemary J. Stevenson (1998). Training Quality and Learning Goals: Towards Effective Learning for All. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):426-427.
Added to index2009-04-12
Total downloads399 ( #3,455 of 1,902,164 )
Recent downloads (6 months)81 ( #6,014 of 1,902,164 )
How can I increase my downloads?