A globalist ideology of post‐Marxism? Hardt and Negri'sEmpire
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (2):193-208 (2005)
| Abstract | Hardt and Negri interpret contemporary sovereignty and politics in the light of a theory of contemporary globalization that is taken to supersede Marxism and former ideological standpoints of the Left. In particular, Hardt and Negri highlight how their reading of empire and multitude breaks with the teleology of Marxism and accepts the openness of events. They advertise the novelty, which is held to consist in their recognition of a thoroughly socialized and globalized world in which there exists no predetermined historical subject of liberation. Hardt and Negri, however, exemplify the continuity between Marxist and post?Marxist ideological standpoints. The continuity between classical Marxism and Hardt and Negri's notion of empire and its supersession resides in the affinity between the normative values that shape Marx's reading of history and the emancipatory character of the multitude, which frames the notion of empire. Hardt and Negri offer a radical Leftist reading of globalization that contrasts with alternative ideological notions that inform more orthodox interpretations of globalization, and thereby points to the ideological character of theories of globalization | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Antonio Negri (2004). Subversive Spinoza: (Un)Contemporary Variations. Distributed Exclusively in the Usa by Palgrave.
Vidar Thorsteinsson (2010). The Common as Body Without Organs. Deleuze Studies 4 (supplement):46-63.
Réal Fillion (2005). Moving Beyond Biopower: Hardt and Negri's Post-Foucauldian Speculative Philosophy of History. History and Theory 44 (4):47–72.
David Camfield (2007). The Multitude and the Kangaroo: A Critique of Hardt and Negri's Theory of Immaterial Labour. Historical Materialism 15 (2):21-52.
Andreas Kalyvas (2003). Feet of Clay? Reflections on Hardt's and Negri's Empire. Constellations 10 (2):264-279.
Ian Markham (2005). Rethinking Globalization : Hardt and Negri in Conversation with Said Nursi. In Ian S. Markham & İbrahim Özdemir (eds.), Globalization, Ethics, and Islam: The Case of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi. Ashgate Pub..
Peter Green (2002). 'The Passage From Imperialism to Empire': A Commentary on Empire by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. Historical Materialism 10 (1):29-77.
Maria Turchetto (2003). The Empire Strikes Back: On Hardt and Negri. Historical Materialism 11 (1):23-36.
Roberto Farneti (2006). Review Essay: Urging Multitudes: On Negri and Hardt's Neo-Roman Militancy : Under Consideration: Antonio Negin and Michael Hardt's Multitude. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):279-292.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads7 ( #133,421 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,069 )How can I increase my downloads? |

