A Minimally Decent Philosophical Method: Analytic Philosophy and Feminism. Hypatia 10 (3):7-30. [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 10 (3):7-30 (1995)
This essay focuses on the extent to which the methods of analytic philosophy can be useful to feminist philosophers. I pose nine general questions feminist philosophers might ask to determine the suitability of a philosophical method. Examples include: Do its typical ways of formulating problems or issues encourage the inclusion of a wide variety of women's points of view? Are its central concepts gender-biased, not merely in their origin, but in very deep, continuing ways? Does it facilitate uncovering roles that gender, politics, power, and social context play in philosophy as well as in other facets of life?
|Keywords||Analytic Feminism Philosophical Method Analytic Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Beaney, Analysis. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Daniel Andler (2000). The Undefinability of Analytic Philosophy. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:267-285.
Yi Jiang & Tongdong Bai (2010). Studies in Analytic Philosophy in China. Synthese 175 (1):3 - 12.
Sara Worley (1995). Feminism, Objectivity, and Analytic Philosophy. Hypatia 10 (3):138 - 156.
Tim Crane (2012). Philosophy, Logic, Science, History. Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):20-37.
Jack Reynolds, James Chase, James Williams & Edwin Mares (2010). Introduction: Post-Analytic and Meta-Continental Philosophy. In James Williams, Jack Reynolds, James Chase & Edwin Mares (eds.), Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. Continuum.
Mark T. Nelson (2004). Must We Argue? The Philosophers' Magazine (26):41-42.
Ann Garry, Analytic Feminism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2010-07-01
Total downloads22 ( #79,499 of 1,102,881 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,874 of 1,102,881 )
How can I increase my downloads?