The "Sensible Object" and the "Uncertain Philosophical Cause"
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press (2008)
Both Immanuel Kant and Paul Guyer have raised important concerns about the limitations of Lockean thought. Following Guyer, I will focus my attention on questions about the proper ambitions and likely achievements of inquiry into the natural/physical world. I will argue that there are at least two important respects, not discussed by Guyer, in which Locke’s account of natural philosophy is much more flexible and accommodating than may be immediately apparent. On my interpretation, however, one crucial source of a too-limited vision of natural philosophy remains in Locke, where he is appropriately criticized by both Kant and Guyer. My method will be to begin with a distinction that Locke draws in the very first draft of the Essay, between what he calls “the sensible object” and, on the other hand, “the uncertain philosophical cause.” I believe that Locke’s notion of “sensible object,” as opposed to uncertain philosophical cause, retains a central place in his thought in the published Essay, despite the fact thateven though this contrast is never made explicitly there. Tracing the evolution of these two concepts in his thought will allow us to track and better understand his developing views about the relation between the project of the.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Timothy M. Costelloe (2007). So Forward to Imagine. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:117-122.
James Phillips (2011). Placing Ugliness in Kant's Third Critique : A Reply to Paul Guyer. Kant-Studien 102 (3):385-395.
Lisa J. Downing (1996). The Cambridge Companion to Locke. Philosophical Review 105 (1):120-122.
Lisa Downing (2007). Locke's Ontology. In Lex Newman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Locke's. Cambridge University Press
I. C. Tipton (ed.) (1977). Locke on Human Understanding: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
R. Sebastian (2007). Comments on Guyer. Inquiry 50 (5):489 – 496.
Lisa Downing (2001). The Uses of Mechanism: Corpuscularianism in Drafts a and B of Locke's Essay. In William Newman, John Murdoch & Cristoph Lüthy (eds.), Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscularian Matter Theory. E.J. Brill 515-534.
Lisa Downing (2008). The "Sensible Object" and the "Uncertain Philosophical Cause". In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press
Added to index2010-05-28
Total downloads40 ( #102,124 of 1,796,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?