Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):51-71 (2004)
|Abstract||The Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) field presents not only a landscape of theories but also a proliferation of approaches, which are controversial, complex and unclear. This article tries to clarify the situation, mapping the territory by classifying the main CSR theories and related approaches in four groups: (1) instrumental theories, in which the corporation is seen as only an instrument for wealth creation, and its social activities are only a means to achieve economic results; (2) political theories, which concern themselves with the power of corporations in society and a responsible use of this power in the political arena; (3) integrative theories, in which the corporation is focused on the satisfaction of social demands; and (4) ethical theories, based on ethical responsibilities of corporations to society. In practice, each CSR theory presents four dimensions related to profits, political performance, social demands and ethical values. The findings suggest the necessity to develop a new theory on the business and society relationship, which should integrate these four dimensions.|
|Keywords||corporate social responsibility corporate responsiveness corporate citizenship stakeholder manage ment corporate social performance issues management sustainable development the common good|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul C. Godfrey, Nile A. Hatch & Jared M. Hansen (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:112-117.
Diana C. Robertson (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and Different Stages of Economic Development: Singapore, Turkey, and Ethiopia. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):617 - 633.
Bert van De Ven (2008). An Ethical Framework for the Marketing of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (2):339 - 352.
Richard T. George (1986). GM and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):177 - 179.
Peter deMaCarty (2005). Equal Financial Returns of Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:99-104.
Denise Kleinrichert (2008). Ethics, Power and Communities: Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 78 (3):475 - 485.
Claes Ohlsson, Stefan Tengblad, Frank G. A. de Bakker, Frank den Hond & Marie-France Turcotte (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:160-165.
Claus Strue Frederiksen (2010). The Relation Between Policies Concerning Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) and Philosophical Moral Theories – an Empirical Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 93 (3):357 - 371.
Thomas Maak (2008). Undivided Corporate Responsibility: Towards a Theory of Corporate Integrity. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (2):353 - 368.
Junwei Shi, Haiyan Fu & Lijun Hu (2007). Social Responsibility, Social Capital, and Corporate Competitive Advantage in Transitional China. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:377-394.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads306 ( #571 of 732,605 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #12,335 of 732,605 )
How can I increase my downloads?