Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):51-71 (2004)
Abstract
The Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) field presents not only a landscape of theories but also a proliferation of approaches, which are controversial, complex and unclear. This article tries to clarify the situation, mapping the territory by classifying the main CSR theories and related approaches in four groups: (1) instrumental theories, in which the corporation is seen as only an instrument for wealth creation, and its social activities are only a means to achieve economic results; (2) political theories, which concern themselves with the power of corporations in society and a responsible use of this power in the political arena; (3) integrative theories, in which the corporation is focused on the satisfaction of social demands; and (4) ethical theories, based on ethical responsibilities of corporations to society. In practice, each CSR theory presents four dimensions related to profits, political performance, social demands and ethical values. The findings suggest the necessity to develop a new theory on the business and society relationship, which should integrate these four dimensions.
Keywords corporate social responsibility  corporate responsiveness  corporate citizenship  stakeholder manage ment  corporate social performance  issues management  sustainable development  the common good
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Yves Fassin (2009). The Stakeholder Model Refined. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):113 - 135.

View all 141 citations

Similar books and articles
Paul C. Godfrey, Nile A. Hatch & Jared M. Hansen (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:112-117.
Richard T. George (1986). GM and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):177 - 179.
Peter deMaCarty (2005). Equal Financial Returns of Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:99-104.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

387 ( #576 of 1,102,758 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

61 ( #1,011 of 1,102,758 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.