Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (2):203–216 (2007)
|Abstract||There are propositions constituting the content of fictions—sometimes of the utmost importance to understand them—which are not explicitly presented, but must somehow be inferred. This essay deals with what these inferences tell us about the nature of fiction. I will criticize three well-known proposals in the literature: those by David Lewis, Gregory Currie, and Kendall Walton. I advocate a proposal of my own, which I will claim improves on theirs. Most important for my purposes, I will argue on this basis, against Walton’s objections, for an illocutionary-act account of fiction, inspired in part by some of Lewis’s and Currie’s suggestions, but (perhaps paradoxically) above all by Walton’s deservedly influential views|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robin le Poidevin (2001). Fate, Fiction and the Future. Philosophical Papers 30 (1):69-92.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). The Realistic Fallacy, Or: The Conception of Literary Narrative Fiction in Analytic Aesthetics. Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (1):1-18.
Fred Adams, Gary Fuller & Robert Stecker (1997). The Semantics of Fictional Names. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):128–148.
Jukka Mikkonen (2008). Philosophical Fiction and the Act of Fiction-Making. SATS 9 (2):116-132.
Gregory Currie (1986). Works of Fiction and Illocutionary Acts. Philosophy and Literature 10 (2):304-308.
Kendall L. Walton (1983). Fiction, Fiction-Making, and Styles of Fictionality. Philosophy and Literature 7 (1):78-88.
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). Sutrop on Literary Fiction-Making: Defending Currie. Disputatio 3 (28):151-157.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). Assertions in Literary Fiction. Minerva 13:144-180.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #19,742 of 722,865 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,384 of 722,865 )
How can I increase my downloads?