David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76:211 - 246 (2002)
[Sebastian Gardner] German idealism has been pictured as an unwarranted deviation from the central epistemological orientation of modern philosophy, and its close historical association with German romanticism is adduced in support of this verdict. This paper proposes an interpretation of German idealism which seeks to grant key importance to its connection with romanticism without thereby undermining its philosophical rationality. I suggest that the fundamental motivation of German idealism is axiological, and that its augment of Kant's idealism is intelligible in terms of its combined aim of consolidating the transcendental turn and legitimating the kind of (objectual) relation to value articulated in German romanticism. /// [Paul Franks] German idealists regard Spinozism as both the realism that outflanks Kant's idealism and the source of the conception of systematicity with which to fortify idealism. But they offer little argument for this view. To fill the gap, I reconstruct arguments that could underlie Jacobi's and Pistorius's tentative but influential suggestions that Kant is or should be a Spinozist. Kant is indeed a monist about phenomena, but, unlike Spinoza, a pluralist about noumena. Nevertheless, it is arguable that the Third Antinomy can be solved by a more thoroughgoing Spinozistic monism. The resulting Spinozism outflanks Kant by acknowledging Jacobi's charge that philosophy annihilates immediacy and individuality, whereas Kant's commitment to things in themselves can seem a half-hearted attempt to avoid the charge. However, the German idealist contention is that only a synthesis of such a Spinozism with Kantian idealism can retrieve immediacy and individuality, thus overcoming nihilism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sebastian Gardner (2002). From Kant to Post-Kantian Idealism: German Idealism: Sebastian Gardner. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):211–228.
Paul Franks (2002). From Kant to Post-Kantian Idealism: German Idealism: Paul Franks. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):229–246.
William Desmond, Ernst-Otto Jan Onnasch & Paul Cruysberghs (eds.) (2004). Philosophy and Religion in German Idealism. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gary Banham (2003). Kant and German Idealisms. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):333 – 339.
Paul W. Franks (2005). All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Harvard University Press.
Sally S. Sedgwick (ed.) (2000). The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Cambridge University Press.
Karl Ameriks (ed.) (2000). The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
Kristin Gjesdal (2009). Gadamer and the Legacy of German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
Sigrun Bielfeldt (2004). Die Wüste des Realen: Slavoj Žižek Und der Deutsche Idealismus. Studies in East European Thought 56 (4):335-356.
Dennis Schulting (2010). Kant's Idealism: The Current Debate. In Dennis Schulting Jacco Verburgt (ed.), Kant's Idealism. Springer.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads14 ( #95,211 of 1,088,397 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,397 )
How can I increase my downloads?