Hypatia 19 (2):1-16 (2004)
|Abstract||: Catharine Beecher held that women possessed a moral power that could allow them to play a vital role in the moral and social progress of nineteenth century America. Problematically, this power could only be obtained through their subordination to the greatest social happiness. I wish to argue that this notion of subordination, properly framed within her ethico-religious system, can in fact lead to economic independence for women and a surprisingly robust conception of moral power|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
F. Clark Power & Ann Marie R. Power (1992). A Raft of Hope: Democratic Education and the Challenge of Pluralism. Journal of Moral Education 21 (3):193-205.
Rae Lesser Blumberg (1984). A General Theory of Gender Stratification. Sociological Theory 2:23-101.
Barbara Applebaum (2003). Social Justice, Democratic Education and the Silencing of Words That Wound. Journal of Moral Education 32 (2):151-162.
Catherine Gardner (1998). Catharine Macaulay's "Letters on Education": Odd but Equal. Hypatia 13 (1):118 - 137.
Sin Yee Chan (2000). Gender and Relationship Roles in the Analects and the Mencius. Asian Philosophy 10 (2):115 – 132.
Thomas Pink (2009). Power and Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Explorations 12 (2):127 – 149.
Kimberly A. Chang (1996). Culture, Power and the Social Construction of Morality: Moral Voices of Chinese Students. Journal of Moral Education 25 (2):141-157.
Sarah Kofman & Mara Dukats (1989). Rousseau's Phallocratic Ends. Hypatia 3 (3):123 - 136.
Catherine Villanueva Gardner (2000). Rediscovering Women Philosophers: Philosophical Genre and the Boundaries of Philosophy. Westview.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #178,473 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?