David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Jurisprudence 1 (2):253-265 (2011)
HLA Hart has sometimes been associated with the false proposition that there is 'no necessary connection between law and morality'. Nigel Simmonds is the latest critic to make the association. He offers an 'ironic' interpretation of a famous passage in Hart's The Concept of Law in which the proposition is apparently rejected as false by Hart. In this paper I explain why, even if Simmonds's ironic interpretation is tenable, it does not associate Hart with the proposition in the way that Simmonds believes that it does. More affirmatively, I show that among several necessary connections between law and morality that Hart defends, there is an important indirect one that runs from law to legality, from legality to justice, and from justice to morality
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Leslie Green (2008). Positivism And The Inseparability Of Law And Morals. New York University Law Review 83:1035--1058.
John Gardner (2012). Law as a Leap of Faith: Essays on Law in General. Oxford University Press.
Mark J. Bennett (2011). Hart and Raz on the Non-Instrumental Moral Value of the Rule of Law: A Reconsideration. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 30 (5):603-635.
N. E. Simmonds (2011). Reply: The Nature and Virtue of Law. Jurisprudence 1 (2):277-293.
Scott J. Shapiro (2007). The "Hart-Dworkin" Debate : A Short Guide for the Perplexed. In Arthur Ripstein (ed.), Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge University Press. 22--49.
Matthew H. Kramer (2013). In Defense of Hart. In Wil Waluchow & Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oup Oxford. 22.
W. J. Waluchow (2008). Legality, Morality, and the Guiding Function of Law. In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Matthew H. Kramer (ed.) (2008). The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Jeremy Waldron (2008). Hart and the Principles of Legality. In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
H. L. A. Hart, P. M. S. Hacker & Joseph Raz (eds.) (1977). Law, Morality, and Society: Essays in Honour of H. L. A. Hart. Clarendon Press.
Philip Schofield (2011). Jeremy Bentham and HLA Hart's 'Utilitarian Tradition in Jurisprudence'. Jurisprudence 1 (2):147-167.
E. N. G. Svein (2011). Lost in the System or Lost in Translation? The Exchanges Between Hart and Ross. Ratio Juris 24 (2):194-246.
Scott Shapiro (2011). Legality. Harvard University Press.
David-Hillel Ruben (1972). Positive and Natural Law Revisited. Modern Schoolman 49 (May):295-317.
M. Gilbert (1999). Social Rules: Some Problems for Hart's Account, and an Alternative Proposal. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 18 (2):141-171.
Added to index2010-11-29
Total downloads139 ( #5,417 of 1,096,223 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #56,841 of 1,096,223 )
How can I increase my downloads?