Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||In this paper I discuss and reply to Malcolm Thorburn's important article 'Justifications, Powers, and Authority', Yale Law Journal 117 (2008), 1070. My discussion raises a wide range of conceptual and doctrinal questions about Thorburn's account of justification defences, and about the theory of justfication defences more generally. The paper also trespasses on some broader questions about the nature of law and its relationship to morality.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
B. Roermund (2000). Authority and Authorisation. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):201-222.
Fabienne Peter, Political Legitimacy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Linda Radzik (1999). A Normative Regress Problem. American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (1):35-47.
Jeffrey Glick (2010). Justification and the Right to Believe. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):532-544.
Christopher S. King (2012). Problems in the Theory of Democratic Authority. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):431 - 448.
Michael Philips (1986). The Justification of Punishment and the Justification of Political Authority. Law and Philosophy 5 (3):393 - 416.
John Gardner (2007). Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Malcolm Thorburn (2011). The Constitution of Criminal Law: Justifications, Policing and the Stateâ€™s Fiduciary Duties. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):259-276.
Linda Radzik (2000). Justification and the Authority of Norms. Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (4):451-461.
Added to index2009-02-22
Total downloads85 ( #10,918 of 756,673 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,427 of 756,673 )
How can I increase my downloads?