David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 15 (4):514-537 (1998)
This essay applies to the morality of lying and other deception a sketch of a kind of virtues-based, input-driven, role-centered, patient-focused, ethical theory. Among the questions treated are: What is wrong with lying? Is it always and intrinsically immoral? Can it be correct, as some have vigorously maintained, that lying is morally wrong in some circumstances where other forms of deliberate dissimulation are not? If so, how can that be? And how can it be that lying to someone is immoral when other, harsher ways of treating her are permissible? The essay examines several responses to the first question, and suggests that lying violates morality as an excessive departure from the role-derived virtues of charity and justice: the liar wills another person the evil of false belief precisely in the proposition for which the speaker offers her assurance and takes special responsibility in asserting. So conceived, lying is an especially egregious form of treachery and degrading manipulation of another person. Appeal is then made to the gravity inherent in lying so conceived to suggest ways of answering the other questions which would support the traditional Augustinian claim that lying is inherently impermissible and ineligible in circumstances where other forms of deliberate deception may not be, and even in situations where violent attack may be permissible.At the end, a taxonomy of more and less rigorist positions of lying is offered. A tentative proposal is made that, while consistent with the traditional Augustinian rigorist position that Iving is always immoral, nevertheless has some features that may slightly soften that view’s practical application. The proposed view does this in a way similar to that in which allowing moral dilemmas may soften it, for allowing dilemmas means there may be cases where an act of a type always immoral may still be more eligible than any alternative. However, it is maintained that the view here proposed need not countenance genuine dilemmas
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas Williams (2000). Lying, Deception, and the Virtue of Truthfulness. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):242-248.
J. Lackey (2013). Lies and Deception: An Unhappy Divorce. Analysis 73 (2):236-248.
Thomas L. Carson (2006). The Definition of Lying. Noûs 40 (2):284–306.
Gini Graham Scott (2010). Playing the Lying Game: Detecting and Dealing with Lies and Liars, From Occasional Fibbers to Frequent Fabricators. Praeger.
Rachel Lynette (2009). How to Deal with Lying. Powerkids Press.
Adam J. Arico & Don Fallis (2013). Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics: An Empirical Investigation of the Concept of Lying. Philosophical Psychology 26 (6):790 - 816.
Don Fallis (2010). Lying and Deception. Philosophers' Imprint 10 (11).
Thomas Carson (2008). Liar Liar. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):189-210.
Shahrar Ali (2011). Why Shouldn't I Lie? Ten Preliminaries. Ethical Record 116 (10):6-10.
Andreas Stokke (2013). Lying and Asserting. Journal of Philosophy 110 (1):33-60.
Alexander R. Pruss (2010). Lies and Dishonest Endorsements. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:213-222.
Christopher Tollefsen (2012). Augustine, Aquinas, and the Absolute Norm Against Lying. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):111-134.
Neil Van Leeuwen (2013). Self-Deception. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Roy Sorensen (2012). Lying with Conditionals. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):820-832.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads4 ( #195,487 of 1,005,412 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,005,412 )
How can I increase my downloads?