David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):363-376 (2012)
This article examines the extent to which Brian Barry?s contractarian political theory ? justice as impartiality ? is able to incorporate the interests of animals. Despite the initial optimism that Barry might provide a theory of justice that can provide substantial protection for the interests of animals, it is clear that he offers relatively little. Insofar as animals can be protected within justice as impartiality, they are not being protected as a result of their intrinsic value, but merely as one, non-vital, human set of beliefs included within a conception of the good. As a result, those concerned about the well-being of animals need either to go beyond contractarianism, and look for alternative theories of justice that are more amenable to the inclusion of animals, or to examine the degree to which direct duties can be owed to animals within a moral realm independently of justice.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Scanlon (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
David P. Gauthier (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford University Press.
Peter Singer (ed.) (1990). Animal Liberation. Avon Books.
Tom Regan (2009). The Case for Animal Rights. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press 425-434.
John Rawls (2009/2005). A Theory of Justice. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press 133-135.
Citations of this work BETA
Julia Tanner (2013). Contractarianism and Secondary Direct Moral Standing for Marginal Humans and Animals. Res Publica 19 (2):1-16.
Josh Milburn (2015). Protection for the Sentient in the Nonideal World: A Review of Robert Garner's A Theory of Justice for Animals. [REVIEW] Journal of Animal Ethics 5 (1):69-75,.
Similar books and articles
Robert Garner (2012). Rawls, Animals and Justice: New Literature, Same Response. [REVIEW] Res Publica 18 (2):159-172.
Michael S. Pritchard & Wade L. Robison (1981). Justice and the Treatment of Animals: A Critique of Rawls. Environmental Ethics 3 (1):55-61.
Brian Barry (1996). Justice as Impartiality: A Treatise on Social Justice, Volume Ii. Clarendon Press.
Julia Tanner (2011). Rowlands, Rawlsian Justice and Animal Experimentation. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):569-587.
Daniel A. Dombrowski (1998). Rawls and Animals. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):63-77.
Jonathan Wolff (2009). Rational, Fair, and Reasonable. Utilitas 8 (3):263.
Kimberly K. Smith (2008). Animals and the Social Contract. Environmental Ethics 30 (2):195-207.
Andrew Mason (1996). Justice, Contestability, and Conceptions of the Good. Utilitas 8 (3):295-305.
Alasdair Cochrane (2011). An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
John Rodman (1979). Animal Justice: The Counter-Revolution in Natural Right and Law. Inquiry 22 (1-4):3 – 22.
Steve Cooke (2011). Duties to Companion Animals. Res Publica 17 (3):261-274.
Keith M. Dowding, Robert E. Goodin, Carole Pateman & Brian Barry (eds.) (2004). Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge University Press.
Brian M. Barry (1995). Justice as Impartiality. Oxford University Press.
John Rossi (2010). Is Equal Moral Consideration Really Compatible with Unequal Moral Status? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (3):251-276.
Donald VanDeVeer (1979). Interspecific Justice. Inquiry 22 (1-4):55 – 79.
Added to index2011-12-06
Total downloads11 ( #300,366 of 1,792,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,915 of 1,792,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?