On reading signs
| Abstract | On Reading Signs; Some Differences between Us and The Others If there are certain kinds of signs that an animal cannot learn to interpret, that might be for any of a number of reasons. It might be, first, because the animal cannot discriminate the signs from one another. For example, although human babies learn to discriminate human speech sounds according to the phonological structures of their native languages very easily, it may be that few if any other animals are capable of fully grasping the phonological structures of human languages. If an animal cannot learn to interpret certain signs it might be, second, because the decoding is too difficult for it. It could be, for example, that some animals are incapable of decoding signs that exhibit syntactic embedding, or signs that are spread out over time as opposed to over space. Problems of these various kinds might be solved by using another sign system, say, gestures rather than noises, or visual icons laid out in spatial order, or by separating out embedded propositions and presenting each separately. But a more interesting reason that an animal might be incapable of understanding a sign would be that it lacked mental representations of the necessary kind. It might be incapable of representing mentally what the sign conveys. When discussing what signs animals can understand or | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper '+r+'').show() })">Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesRisto Hilpinen (2007). On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):610 - 618.
John Nessa (1996). About Signs and Symptoms: Can Semiotics Expand the View of Clinical Medicine? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (4).
Charles Morris (1948). Signs About Signs About Signs. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (1):115-133.
James H. Fetzer (1997). Thinking and Computing: Computers as Special Kinds of Signs. Minds and Machines 7 (3):345-364.
Charles W. Morris (1972). Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague,Mouton.
Kenneth A. Taylor (2007). Sign, Sign, Everywhere a Sign! Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):703–709.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads29 ( #42,304 of 548,986 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,181 of 548,986 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
