David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):347-366 (2006)
: This paper argues that pragmatists must be more cognizant of the concept of "power" and its consequences. To demonstrate this, I show how Foucault's analytics of power can be brought into Peirce's theory of signs. Central to both philosophers is the role of action. Using the concept of action, I explain that Foucault's conception of power, action on actions, can be understood as structuring Peircian habits, which are rules for action. From here I build out to Peirce's semiotics, illustrating how power channels the meanings of signs in certain directions. The rest of the paper is dedicated to reconstructing in light of Foucault Peirce's claim that the subject is nothing more than the signs it uses. I argue that any understanding of the subject must account for the subject being distributed through a field of power. The paper concludes by proposing a new "philosophy of the subject" which seeks to reconcile Foucault's concerns with those of pragmatism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Mark Blasius (1993). About the Beginning of the Hermeneutics of the Self. Political Theory 21 (2):198-227.
John Dewey (1946). Peirce's Theory of Linguistic Signs, Thought, and Meaning. Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):85-95.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chia-Ling Wang (2011). Power/Knowledge for Educational Theory: Stephen Ball and the Reception of Foucault. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (1):141-156.
Albert Atkin (2008). Peirce's Final Account of Signs and the Philosophy of Language. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (1):pp. 63-85.
Rob Devos (2002). The Return of the Subject in Michel Foucault. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (2):255-280.
Lotar Rasiński (2011). Power, Discourse, and Subject. The Case of Laclau and Foucault. Polish Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):117-136.
Neve Gordon (2002). On Visibility and Power: An Arendtian Corrective of Foucault. [REVIEW] Human Studies 25 (2):125-145.
Judith Butler (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford University Press.
Derek Hook (2007). Foucault, Psychology and the Analytics of Power. Palgrave Macmillan.
A. W. McHoul (1993/1998). A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power, and the Subject. University of Otago Press.
Benda Hofmeyr (2006). The Power Not to Be (What We Are): The Politics and Ethics of Self-Creation in Foucault. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (2):215-230.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads52 ( #80,864 of 1,796,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #44,727 of 1,796,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?