David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):96-119 (2000)
This paper attempts in the first instance to clarify the application of the personal/sub-personal distinction to psychoanalysis and to indicate how this issue is related to that of psychoanalysis" epistemology. It is argued that psychoanalysis may be regarded either as a form of personal psychology, or as a form of jointly personal and sub-personal psychology, but not as a form of sub-personal psychology. It is further argued that psychoanalysis indicates a problem with the personal/sub-personal distinction itself as understood by Dennett A revised view of the distinction, which is argued to reflect its true metaphysical significance, is proposed
|Keywords||Personal Psychoanalysis Science Sub-personal Dennett, D|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jerry A. Fodor (1975). The Language of Thought. Harvard University Press.
Karl R. Popper (1989/2002). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge.
Daniel C. Dennet (ed.) (1978). Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Bradford Books.
Edmund Husserl (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston,Northwestern University Press.
Jürgen Habermas (1978/1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Heinemann Educational.
Citations of this work BETA
Maarten Boudry & Filip Buekens (2011). The Epistemic Predicament of a Pseudoscience: Social Constructivism Confronts Freudian Psychoanalysis. Theoria 77 (2):159-179.
Michael Lacewing (2013). Expert Moral Intuition and Its Development: A Guide to the Debate. Topoi 34 (2):1-17.
Similar books and articles
Roland Peterson & Sybe Terwee (1994). Can Functionalism Provide the Proper Basis for a Core Theory of Psychoanalysis? Philosophical Psychology 7 (4):463-469.
Matthew Elton (2000). Consciousness: Only at the Personal Level. Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):25-42.
John Ambrosio (2010). A Fearsome Trap: The Will to Know, the Obligation to Confess, and the Freudian Subject of Desire. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (7):728-741.
Martin Davies (2000). Interaction Without Reduction: The Relationship Between Personal and Subpersonal Levels of Description. Mind and Society 1 (2):87-105.
R. D. Hinshelwood (1995). The Social Relocation of Personal Identity as Shown by Psychoanalytic Observations of Splitting, Projection and Introjection. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 2 (3):185-204.
Jose Luis Bermudez (2000). Personal and Subpersonal: A Difference Without a Distinction. Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):63-82.
José Luis Bermúdez (2000). Personal and Sub-Personal; a Difference Without a Distinction. Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):63 – 82.
Manuel de Pinedo (2007). When My Own Beliefs Are Not First-Personal Enough. Theoria 22 (1):35-41.
Hilan Bensusan & Manuel de Pinedo (2007). When My Own Beliefs Are Not First-Personal Enough. Theoria 22 (1):35-41.
Jennifer Hornsby (2000). Personal and Sub-Personal: A Defence of Dennett's Early Distinction. Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):6-24.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads118 ( #18,804 of 1,725,237 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #110,379 of 1,725,237 )
How can I increase my downloads?