Penal Coercion in Contexts of Social Injustice

Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):21-38 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article addresses the theoretical difficulty of justifying the use of penal coercion in circumstances of marked, unjustified social inequality. The intuitive belief behind the text is that in such a context—that of an indecent State—justifying penal coercion becomes very problematic, particularly when directed against the most disfavored members of society

Similar books and articles

Punishment and Freedom.Alan Brudner - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Rationally Justifying Political Coercion.Russell Hardin - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Research 15:79-91.
Equality, coercion, culture and social norms.Richard J. Arneson - 2003 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):139-163.
Threats and Coercion.Martin Gunderson - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):247 - 259.
Book review / the future of penal reform. [REVIEW]Robert L. Bonn - 1988 - Criminal Justice Ethics 7 (2):79-84.
Do we believe in penal substitution?David K. Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Papers 26 (3):203 - 209.
Coercion and Justice.Laura Valentini - 2011 - American Political Science Review 105 (1):205-220.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
64 (#243,546)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
World Poverty and Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):1-7.

View all 32 references / Add more references