Supply‐side vs. demand‐side tax cuts and U.S. economic growth, 1951–2004

Critical Review 17 (3-4):427-448 (2005)
Abstract
Abstract Supply?side economists claim that a low top marginal income?tax rate accelerates investment, employment, and economic growth. But the economic literature cited to support the supply?side hypothesis provides little to no empirical support for it. And a more comprehensive empirical examination of key parameters of U.S. economic performance in the postwar period, undertaken here, shows no association between low top marginal income?tax rates and high real growth in investment, employment, or GDP. By contrast, the analysis yields strong evidence for the economic?growth benefits of a ?demand?side? approach to taxation policy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Jeffrey Friedman (2005). The Bias Issue. Critical Review 17 (3-4):221-236.
    Similar books and articles
    Richard Vedder (2006). Taxes, Growth, Equity, and Welfare. Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2):53-72.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-10-18

    Total downloads

    3 ( #224,108 of 1,089,155 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,735 of 1,089,155 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.