Supply‐side vs. demand‐side tax cuts and U.S. economic growth, 1951–2004

Critical Review 17 (3-4):427-448 (2005)
Abstract
Abstract Supply?side economists claim that a low top marginal income?tax rate accelerates investment, employment, and economic growth. But the economic literature cited to support the supply?side hypothesis provides little to no empirical support for it. And a more comprehensive empirical examination of key parameters of U.S. economic performance in the postwar period, undertaken here, shows no association between low top marginal income?tax rates and high real growth in investment, employment, or GDP. By contrast, the analysis yields strong evidence for the economic?growth benefits of a ?demand?side? approach to taxation policy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Jeffrey Friedman (2005). The Bias Issue. Critical Review 17 (3-4):221-236.
Similar books and articles
Richard Vedder (2006). Taxes, Growth, Equity, and Welfare. Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2):53-72.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-10-18

Total downloads

3 ( #297,594 of 1,102,812 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #296,987 of 1,102,812 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.