The new critique of anti-consequentialist moral theory
Philosophical Studies 71 (1):1 - 32 (1993)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesElinor Mason (2002). Against Blameless Wrongdoing. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (3):287-303.
Terrance C. McConnell (1981). Moral Absolutism and the Problem of Hard Cases. Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (2):286 - 297.
Nora Hämäläinen (2009). Is Moral Theory Harmful in Practice?—Relocating Anti-Theory in Contemporary Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5).
Michael Davis (2010). What Punishment for the Murder of 10,000? Res Publica 16 (2).
Jens Timmermann (2005). Why Kant Could Not Have Been a Utilitarian. Utilitas 17 (3):243-264.
Alastair Norcross (1997). Consequentialism and Commitment. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):380–403.
Campbell Brown (2011). Consequentialize This. Ethics 121 (4):749-771.
Douglas W. Portmore (2007). Consequentializing Moral Theories. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (1):39–73.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,107 of 550,917 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
