David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):21-33 (2013)
Many philosophers believe that agents are self-ruled only when ruled by their (authentic) selves. Though this view is rarely argued for explicitly, one tempting line of thought suggests that self-rule is just obviously equivalent to rule by the self . However, the plausibility of this thought evaporates upon close examination of the logic of ‘self-rule’ and similar reflexives. Moreover, attempts to rescue the account by recasting it in negative terms are unpromising. In light of these problems, this paper instead proposes that agents are self-ruled only when not ruled by others. One reason for favouring this negative social view is its ability to yield plausible conclusions concerning various manipulation cases that are notoriously problematic for nonsocial accounts of self-rule. A second reason is that the account conforms with ordinary usage. It is concluded that self-rule may be best thought of as an essentially social concept.
|Keywords||Self-rule Autonomy Agency Manipulation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Sarah Buss (2005). Valuing Autonomy and Respecting Persons: Manipulation, Seduction, and the Basis of Moral Constraints. Ethics 115 (2):195-235.
John Christman (2013). Autonomy. In Roger Crisp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics. Oxford University Press. 281-293.
John Christman (1991). Autonomy and Personal History. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):1 - 24.
John Philip Christman (2009). The Politics of Persons: Individual Autonomy and Socio-Historical Selves. Cambridge University Press.
Laura Waddell Ekstrom (1993). A Coherence Theory of Autonomy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):599-616.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Wes Sharrock & Graham Button (1999). Do the Right Thing! Rule Finitism, Rule Scepticism and Rule Following. Human Studies 22 (2-4):193-210.
Brian K. Burton & Michael Goldsby (2005). The Golden Rule and Business Ethics: An Examination. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 56 (4):371 - 383.
Markus E. Schlosser (2011). The Metaphysics of Rule-Following. Philosophical Studies 155 (3):345-369.
Karsten R. Stueber (2005). How to Think About Rules and Rule Following. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):307-323.
J. Hughes & T. Walker (2009). The Rule of Rescue in Clinical Practice. Clinical Ethics 4 (1):50-54.
Frank Hindriks (2007). The Status of the Knowledge Account of Assertion. Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (3):393-406.
Donna M. Summerfield (1990). On Taking the Rabbit of Rule-Following Out of the Hat of Representation: A Response to Pettit's The Reality of Rule-Following. Mind 99 (395):425-432.
Clifton Perry (2007). Exhuming the Body of the Corpus Delicti Rule. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):253-264.
Tomoji Shogenji (2000). The Problem of the Criterion in Rule-Following. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):501-525.
Jussi Haukioja (2005). Is Solitary Rule-Following Possible? Philosophia 32 (1-4):131-154.
Jussi Suikkanen (2008). A Dilemma for Rule-Consequentialism. Philosophia 36 (1):141-150.
Allen Stairs (1982). Quantum Logic and the Luders Rule. Philosophy of Science 49 (3):422-436.
Philip Pettit (1990). The Reality of Rule-Following. Mind 99 (393):1-21.
Added to index2011-11-09
Total downloads41 ( #40,544 of 1,099,017 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #80,012 of 1,099,017 )
How can I increase my downloads?