Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia 28 (1-4):455-465 (2001)
|Abstract||In "Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?", Howard Wettstein denies that semantics must account for cognitive significance. He thus rejects Frege's condition of adequacy for semantics and rids the new theorists from seemingly intractable puzzles. In a more recent article, Wettstein claims that not only reference but even cognitive significance is not a matter of how the referent is presented to the mind of the speaker. In this paper, I submit that the crucial element in the debate between new theorists and neo-Fregeans concerning the semantic significance of language is the connection between semantic matters and the human thougth.|
|Keywords||Frege Cognitive Significance Howard Wettstein Philosophy of Language New theory of reference Neo-Fregean theory of reference|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. Ruz (2006). Let the Brain Explain the Mind: The Case of Attention. Philosophical Psychology 19 (4):495-505.
Kenneth A. Taylor (1995). Meaning, Reference and Cognitive Significance. Mind and Language 10 (1-2):129-180.
Andrew Howes (2012). Useful Theories Make Predictions. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):84-86.
Paula Gaido (2011). The Purpose of Legal Theory: Some Problems with Joseph Raz's View. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 30 (6):685-698.
Daniel Dennett (1993). Review of Varela, E. Thompson and E. Rosch, (Eds. )The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. [REVIEW] .
Vojislav Bozickovic (2008). Cognitive Significance and Reflexive Content. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (5):545-554.
Howard Wettstein (1988). Cognitive Significance Without Cognitive Content. Mind 97 (385):1-28.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,793 of 739,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?