David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and International Affairs 24 (1):69-90 (2010)
The jury system is one of the oldest deliberative democratic bodies, and it has a robust historical record spanning hundreds of years in numerous countries. As scholars and civic reformers envision a democratic global public sphere and international institutions, we advocate for the inclusion of juries of lay citizens as a means of administering justice and promoting deliberative norms. Focusing specifically on the case of the International Criminal Court, we show how juries could bolster that institution's legitimacy by promoting public trust, increasing procedural fairness, foregrounding deliberative reasoning, and embodying democratic values. Juries would present novel logistical, philosophical, and legal problems, but we show how each of these might be overcome to make juries a viable element of global governance.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniele Archibugi & David Held (2011). Cosmopolitan Democracy: Paths and Agents. Ethics and International Affairs 25 (4):433-461.
Similar books and articles
Kevin T. Jackson (1998). A Cosmopolitan Court for Transnational Corporate Wrongdoing: Why its Time has Come. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (7):757-783.
Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) (2010). International Criminal Law and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Frederic Megret, In Search of the 'Vertical': An Exploration of What Makes International Criminal Tribunals Different (and Why).
Stefan Rummens (2009). No Justice Without Democracy: A Deliberative Approach to the Global Distribution of Wealth. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (5):657-680.
Stefanie Grant (1997). Commentary: Matching Rhetoric with Action: The Challenge of an International Criminal Court. Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (2):2-53.
Michael Davis (2000). Revenge, Victim's Rights, and Criminal Justice. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):119-128.
Thom Brooks (2004). A Defence of Jury Nullification. Res Publica 10 (4):401-423.
Thom Brooks (2004). The Right to Trial by Jury. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):197–212.
Mary R. Rose, Christopher G. Ellison & Shari Seidman Diamond, Preferences for Juries Over Judges Across Racial and Ethnic Groups.
Added to index2010-03-12
Total downloads18 ( #193,990 of 1,789,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #140,142 of 1,789,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?